AI Cyberattack Mission Planning for Red and Blue Team Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Red and blue team cybersecurity assessments rely heavily on individual expertise and intuition, leading to inconsistent quality and incomplete coverage of potential cybersecurity concerns due to gaps in knowledge and experience, with existing automated tools failing to integrate evolving network data effectively.

Innovation Solution

An AI-assisted cybersecurity mission planning and analysis system that uses machine learning algorithms to generate cyberattack scenarios, track evolving knowledge, and provide suggestions for both red and blue teams, integrating data from various tools and databases to enhance comprehensive simulation and decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If red and blue team assessments rely on individual expertise and intuition, then the quality of assessments varies based on team member knowledge, but the coverage of potential cybersecurity concerns becomes incomplete due to knowledge gaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment qualityVSAvoidcoverage of cybersecurity concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the assessment process into distinct functional modules: attack path generation, defense strategy generation, scenario simulation, and result analysis. Each module is specialized and can be independently optimized, allowing comprehensive coverage of cybersecurity concerns while maintaining high assessment quality through focused expertise in each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an AI-based intermediary system that acts as a mediator between red and blue teams. This intermediary generates attack paths, defends strategies, and simulates scenarios objectively,弥补ing the knowledge gaps of individual team members while maintaining assessment quality through algorithmic consistency and comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated pen test solutions are used to reduce manpower, then the manual effort decreases, but the integration of evolving network data and dynamic attack path tracking becomes inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanpower efficiencyVSAvoiddynamic data integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic attack path generation that adapts to changing network conditions. The attack paths are not static but are continuously updated based on real-time network data, defender actions, and emerging vulnerabilities. This dynamic approach allows automated tools to maintain high productivity while achieving comprehensive and adaptive data integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where the system continuously monitors network responses, defender actions, and attack outcomes. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust and refine attack paths, ensuring that automated pen test solutions can integrate evolving network data effectively while maintaining high productivity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive red and blue team exercises are conducted to address all cybersecurity concerns, then the coverage improves, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of cybersecurity concernsVSAvoidexercise duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating attack paths and defense strategies based on known vulnerability patterns and threat intelligence. This preliminary preparation allows comprehensive coverage of cybersecurity concerns to be achieved without requiring extensive real-time exercise duration, as much of the analytical work is done in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating virtual representations of attack scenarios and network states. Instead of requiring exhaustive real-world testing for all possible attack vectors, the system creates simulated copies of attack paths and scenarios that can be analyzed comprehensively in a condensed time frame, maintaining coverage while reducing actual exercise duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Adaptability or versatility

If AI algorithms are used to generate attack paths and provide suggestions, then the comprehensiveness of assessments improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment comprehensivenessVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal AI platform that performs multiple functions: generating attack paths, creating defense strategies, simulating scenarios, and analyzing results. This multi-functional approach achieves comprehensive assessment coverage while managing system complexity by consolidating diverse capabilities into a single integrated platform rather than requiring separate complex systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260046278A1Dynamic Cyberattack Mission Planning and Analysis
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 QPX LLC
  • US20260046278A1 patent drawing
  • US20260046278A1 patent drawing
  • US20260046278A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Cybersecurity mission planning and analysis uses artificial intelligence systems to make red and blue team exercises more comprehensive and effective by supplementing individual expertise, reducing reliance on intuition, and eliminating gaps in knowledge. In an embodiment, a platform for cyberattack missions planning and analysis by red and blue teams is coordinated by a control center. An incident generator generates cyberattack scenarios and events using data from external databases and an internal attack knowledge manager having a knowledge graph of data about the network under attack in conjunction with one or more machine learning algorithms configured to identify potential network vulnerabilities. Red are guided by a machine learning algorithm configured to provide suggestions as to potential successful attack paths. Blue teams are guided by a machine learning algorithm configured to provide suggestions as to potential successful attack paths.