AI Cybersecurity Detection Prioritization Using Historical Timing Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity management systems rely on manual detection prioritization, which is time-consuming, prone to errors, and inefficient in handling numerous and evolving threats, and rule-based approaches fail to adapt to new attack vectors.

Innovation Solution

Transform historical cybersecurity detection data into rank ordered detection datasets and use an AI model trained on these datasets to prioritize detections, considering resolution times and urgency, thereby automating the prioritization process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual detection prioritization is used, then analysts can review and investigate detections, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient in handling numerous threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection prioritization processVSAvoidtime required for manual review
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service prioritization by using AI models to automatically assess and rank cybersecurity detections based on historical data patterns, eliminating the need for manual analyst intervention in the prioritization decision-making process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual review process with an AI-based automated system that uses machine learning models to perform detection prioritization, substituting human cognitive processing with computational algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual detection prioritization is used, then analysts can make prioritization decisions, but the process is prone to errors and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprioritization decision makingVSAvoidprioritization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the AI model continuously learns from historical detection data and analyst resolutions, adjusting its prioritization algorithms to improve accuracy and reduce errors over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual decision-making is replaced with automated AI-based decision support that provides consistent, objective prioritization rankings based on learned patterns from historical data, eliminating human error and inconsistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If rule-based approaches are used for prioritization, then the system can automatically filter detections, but it fails to adapt to new attack vectors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection filteringVSAvoidadaptation to new threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static rule-based prioritization to dynamic AI-based prioritization that continuously adapts to new attack vectors by learning from historical detection data and evolving threat patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the underlying parameters of prioritization from fixed rules to learned patterns and probabilities, enabling the system to adapt to new threats through continuous training on historical data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If all detections are reviewed manually, then no false positives are missed, but the efficiency of threat response is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive rateVSAvoidthreat response efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual review of all detections with AI-based automated prioritization that efficiently ranks detections by severity and urgency, enabling analysts to focus only on high-priority items while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring complete manual review of all detections, the system uses AI to perform partial automated prioritization that is sufficient for efficient threat response, allowing analysts to concentrate resources on the most critical detections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12401679B1AI model based cybersecurity detection prioritization for cybersecurity management systems
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 CROWDSTRIKE
  • US12401679B1 patent drawing
  • US12401679B1 patent drawing
  • US12401679B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides an approach of collecting historical cybersecurity detection data comprising a plurality of cybersecurity detections and a plurality of detection times. The approach transforms the historical cybersecurity detection data into a plurality of rank ordered detection datasets that rank order each one of the plurality of cybersecurity detections based on the plurality of detection times. In turn, the approach trains an artificial intelligence (AI) model using the plurality of rank ordered detection datasets to generate a prioritized output dataset from an input dataset.