AI Damage Prediction System for Rapid Structural Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing damage to structures after natural disasters or hazards are time-consuming and require manual inspections, especially when multiple structures are affected, leading to delays in processing insurance claims.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing artificial intelligence and aerial vehicles equipped with cameras to rapidly assess structural damage by obtaining hazard data, identifying impacted parcels, generating flight paths, capturing images, and using machine learning models to annotate potential damage and estimate damage scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection methods are used to assess structural damage, then measurement precision can be maintained, but productivity decreases significantly when multiple structures are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidinspection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses aerial vehicles to capture images and creates digital copies of structures from multiple angles. These image copies are then analyzed using machine learning models to identify damage, replacing the need for physical manual inspection while maintaining assessment accuracy through detailed visual documentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual inspection process with an automated system combining aerial vehicles, camera systems, and machine learning algorithms. The machine learning model automatically analyzes captured images to detect and classify damage, substituting human inspectors with an automated computational system that operates faster and handles multiple structures simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated aerial vehicle inspection is implemented, then productivity increases for assessing multiple structures, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aerial vehicle system is designed as a multi-functional platform that combines navigation, image capture from multiple angles, and integration with machine learning analysis. This universal system can assess various structure types (buildings, bridges, infrastructure) using the same core technology, managing complexity through standardized processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an image processing and machine learning analysis system as an intermediary between the aerial vehicle capture process and the final damage assessment. This intermediary layer automatically processes images, identifies damage patterns, and generates reports, reducing the operational complexity of coordinating multiple vehicles and inspectors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive image capture from multiple angles is performed, then measurement precision improves for damage identification, but loss of time increases due to extended flight paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing images from multiple angles during a single coordinated flight sequence before analysis begins. The aerial vehicle is pre-programmed with flight paths that ensure comprehensive coverage, and images are captured and stored for later batch processing, eliminating the need for multiple return flights

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by capturing images continuously along predetermined flight paths without interruption. The aerial vehicle flies through programmed routes capturing images at multiple angles in a continuous sequence, maximizing data collection efficiency while minimizing total inspection time through uninterrupted operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12236489B2Damage prediction system using artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US12236489B2 patent drawing
  • US12236489B2 patent drawing
  • US12236489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A damage prediction system that uses hazard data and/or aerial images to predict future damage and/or estimate existing damage to a structure is described herein. For example, the damage prediction system may use forecasted hazard data to predict future damage or use actual hazard data to estimate existing damage. The damage prediction system may obtain hazard data in which structures were or will be impacted by a hazard. The damage prediction system can then generate a flight plan that causes an aerial vehicle to fly over the impacted parcels and capture images. The damage prediction system can use artificial intelligence to process the images for the purpose of identifying potential damage. The damage prediction system can also use a hazard model, the hazard data, and structure characteristics to generate a damage score. The damage prediction system can then use the processed images and/or damage score to generate a virtual claim.