AI Dance Performance Scoring Using Video and Audio Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dance competitions often rely on subjective human judgments, leading to biased and unfair evaluations that undermine the integrity of the competitions, lacking objective and comprehensive feedback for dancers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using artificial intelligence to evaluate dance performances through video and audio signals, assessing technical proficiency, artistic expression, musicality, choreography, costume and set design, and individual style, with a weighted linear combination to generate an overall score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple human judges are used to evaluate dance performance, then comprehensive evaluation coverage is improved, but subjectivity and bias increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation coverageVSAvoidobjectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an AI-based evaluation system as an intermediary between the dance performance and the final scoring. This intermediary processes video and audio signals objectively, reducing human bias while maintaining comprehensive evaluation coverage across multiple dance aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human judgment with an AI-based automated evaluation system. This substitution eliminates human subjectivity and bias while maintaining the ability to evaluate multiple aspects of dance performance comprehensively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If AI-based evaluation is implemented, then objectivity is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveobjectivityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a multi-functional AI evaluation system that handles video processing, audio processing, movement analysis, and scoring generation within a single integrated platform. This universality manages system complexity by consolidating multiple functions rather than requiring separate systems for each evaluation aspect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The AI evaluation system is designed to autonomously process dance performances without requiring complex manual configuration or intervention. The system self-manages the evaluation process from data collection to score generation, reducing the operational complexity burden on users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive dance aspects are evaluated, then evaluation quality is improved, but evaluation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation qualityVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous automated processing of dance evaluation data by the AI system. Unlike manual evaluation that requires sequential review of different aspects, the AI system simultaneously and continuously analyzes all dance aspects, maintaining high evaluation quality while significantly reducing total evaluation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the evaluation process from manual parameter assessment to automated parameter analysis. The AI system rapidly processes multiple evaluation parameters (technical proficiency, artistic expression, musicality, etc.) in parallel, maintaining comprehensive quality assessment while dramatically reducing the time required compared to sequential human evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260024376A1System and method for using sensors and sensor data to evaluate dance performance
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 CHEN MARILYN S
  • US20260024376A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024376A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024376A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dance performance may be evaluated by comparing video and audio of the performance to dance evaluation data in order to assess scores for: technical proficiency based on a quality of each dance move in the performance; artistic expression based on a quality of a dancer's facial expressions, body language, and gestures; musicality and rhythm based on a comparison of dance moves in the video to sounds in the corresponding audio; and choreography based on a quality of a storytelling, emotional expression, and visual impact of the performance. A costume and set design score may be assessed based on a quality of style, creativity and uniqueness of the costumes and sets of the performance; and an individual style score may be assessed based on a quality of a dancer's individuality. A total score for the performance may be calculated based on the assessed scores and the scores may be displayed.