AI Training Data Conditioning for Autonomous Vehicle Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI systems for autonomous vehicles face challenges in generating safe behavior due to biased training data, leading to high complexity and computing costs in optimizing data sets, making it difficult to achieve a safely behaving AI without prior optimization.

Innovation Solution

A computer program product that receives raw data from machines, conditions it by grouping into a hierarchical tree-like structure, detects and balances imbalances, and outputs optimized data for AI training, reducing complexity and computing costs while ensuring safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If raw data is used directly for AI training, then the training process is simple, but the AI safety and reliability deteriorate due to biased data

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI safetyVSAvoiddata optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing data conditioning and balancing before AI training. The system pre-processes raw data to identify and correct biases, ensuring balanced representation of different driving scenarios, weather conditions, and road types. This preliminary optimization of training data quality prevents safety issues from arising during AI deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive data optimization is performed to ensure AI safety, then AI reliability improves, but computing costs and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI safetyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data optimization process into distinct modular steps: data collection, conditioning (structuring and categorizing), imbalance detection, and balancing. Each module handles a specific aspect of data processing independently, allowing for efficient computation and enabling parallel processing of different data subsets, thereby reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive safety optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If data is structured and conditioned before training, then AI training efficiency improves, but the preprocessing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI training efficiencyVSAvoidpreprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal data conditioning framework that handles multiple data types (sensor data, trajectory data, environmental data) through a single standardized process. The conditioning module structures diverse data formats into a unified representation that can be used across different AI training scenarios, eliminating the need for separate preprocessing pipelines for each data type and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230196194A1Computer program product and artificial intelligence training control device
Publication Date: 2023.06.22 ASTEMO LTD
  • US20230196194A1 patent drawing
  • US20230196194A1 patent drawing
  • US20230196194A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer program product comprising computer-readable instructions that, when executed in a computer system including one or more computers, cause the computer system to receive a data set of a machine driven by a human or robot driver; condition said data set by grouping the data based on predefined or definable machine-control parameters; search the conditioned data for determining data imbalances within groups or sub-groups of the conditioned data; balance the data for which an imbalance was determined; and output the balanced data.