AI Data Remediation System for Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data processing methodologies struggle with handling large datasets containing anomalies, which affects data quality and leads to inaccurate predictions and regulatory compliance issues, as well as inefficient use of resources due to the need for human intervention in data quality management.

Innovation Solution

An AI-based automatic data remediation system that identifies and remedies anomalies using statistical checks, machine learning techniques such as isolation forests and deep learning autoencoders, replacing anomalous data points with expected values generated from historical data, thereby improving data integrity and reducing human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional data processing methodologies are used to handle large datasets, then data storage and collection capabilities are maintained, but data quality deteriorates due to anomalies affecting predictions and analytics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary anomaly detection and remediation actions before data is used for analytics and predictions. By proactively identifying anomalies through statistical checks and machine learning models, and automatically remediating them by replacing with expected values, the system ensures data quality is maintained before downstream processes consume the data, resolving the contradiction between handling large data volumes and maintaining data reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where anomaly detection results trigger automatic remediation actions. The anomaly detection module continuously monitors data quality metrics and feeds this information back to the remediation module, which adjusts its remediation strategies based on the detected anomaly patterns. This closed-loop feedback system maintains data quality while processing large datasets by dynamically responding to quality issues as they arise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual intervention is used for data quality management, then data accuracy can be improved, but resource efficiency deteriorates due to increased human effort and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the data remediation system independently detects anomalies, determines appropriate remediation actions, and executes corrections without human intervention. The machine learning models automatically identify anomaly patterns and the system autonomously replaces anomalous values with expected values derived from historical data or statistical models, maintaining data accuracy while eliminating the need for manual data quality management efforts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical processes of data quality review and correction with automated computational processes. Machine learning algorithms and statistical analysis tools substitute for human analysts in detecting and remediating anomalies, using computational power to process and correct data at scales and speeds that manual processes cannot achieve, thereby maintaining accuracy while dramatically improving resource efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If human experts are deployed for data quality management, then complex anomaly detection can be achieved, but cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces expert human analysis with sophisticated machine learning models and automated statistical analysis tools that can detect complex anomaly patterns. These computational systems use advanced algorithms including isolation forests, autoencoders, and statistical process control to identify subtle anomaly patterns that would require expert human knowledge, executing these complex detections automatically and instantaneously without the time consumption associated with manual expert review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters and thresholds based on historical data patterns and learned anomaly characteristics. By changing detection sensitivity parameters, statistical thresholds, and model configuration settings automatically based on data characteristics, the system achieves expert-level detection capability while maintaining efficient automated operation without requiring manual parameter tuning by experts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automated remediation is implemented, then productivity is improved by reducing manual effort, but system complexity increases due to the need for AI/ML components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the data quality management process into distinct modular components: data ingestion module, statistical check module, anomaly detection module (with separate algorithms for different anomaly types), expected value generation module, and remediation module. Each component performs a specific function and can be independently configured and maintained. This segmentation manages system complexity by breaking down the automated remediation system into manageable, specialized modules while maintaining high operational efficiency through their coordinated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components such as expected value models and anomaly scoring mechanisms that mediate between raw data and remediation actions. These intermediary layers process and transform data in standardized ways, providing a buffer that simplifies the overall system architecture. The intermediaries convert diverse data types into standardized representations that can be processed by remediation logic, managing complexity while enabling automated high-productivity operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11093519B2Artificial intelligence (AI) based automatic data remediation
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US11093519B2 patent drawing
  • US11093519B2 patent drawing
  • US11093519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based data remediation system accesses analyzes a dataset for identification and remediation of anomalies including missing values and outliers. Based on the attributes associated with the anomalies, the dataset is initially processed via statistical checks for identifying if the dataset includes one of point anomalies, contextual anomalies and time trend anomalies. Based on the type of anomalies various machine learning (ML) based techniques can be employed for identification of the anomalous data points. Expected values are generated. The anomalous data points are replaced with the expected values for the generation of a transformed dataset.