AI Data Interpretation System for Training Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current training methods require significant human involvement, particularly in specialized occupations, leading to time-consuming and costly training processes.

Innovation Solution

A data-interpretation system that utilizes an artificial-intelligence infrastructure to interpret data associated with user training, education, and learning, facilitating the determination of predicted outcomes and providing real-time feedback without the need for human instructors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human instructors are used to interpret student performance and provide feedback, then training quality and personalization are improved, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy of the human instructor's expertise through an AI system that processes training data, performance metrics, and feedback patterns. This digital twin can interpret student performance and provide personalized feedback without the time and cost constraints of human instructors, while maintaining the quality and personalization benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an AI-based intermediary system that acts as a mediator between student performance data and personalized feedback. This intermediary automatically processes raw data, identifies performance patterns, and generates tailored feedback, eliminating the need for direct human instructor involvement while preserving training quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If human instructors are used to interpret student performance and provide feedback, then training quality and personalization are improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining qualityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy of the human instructor's expertise through an AI system that processes training data, performance metrics, and feedback patterns. This digital twin can interpret student performance and provide personalized feedback without the time and cost constraints of human instructors, while maintaining the quality and personalization benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the training system to serve itself by automatically processing performance data and generating feedback without human instructor intervention. The AI system autonomously analyzes student performance, identifies areas for improvement, and delivers personalized feedback, making the training process self-sufficient and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If traditional training methods are used, then comprehensive feedback and guidance are provided, but training duration extends from days to months

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback qualityVSAvoidtraining duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback processing where the AI system constantly analyzes student performance data and provides immediate personalized guidance throughout the training process. This continuous action eliminates the delays inherent in traditional periodic instructor reviews, maintaining high feedback quality while compressing training duration from days or months to real-time or near-real-time intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing and pre-analyzing performance data patterns to predict student needs and provide proactive feedback before issues fully develop. This anticipatory approach maintains comprehensive guidance quality while reducing the overall time required for students to master skills by addressing problems before they require extensive correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12314823B2Systems and methods for facilitating data interpretation
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 TYBRAM LLC
  • US12314823B2 patent drawing
  • US12314823B2 patent drawing
  • US12314823B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides generally for systems and methods for facilitating data interpretation. In some aspects, a data-interpretation system includes a data source and an artificial-intelligence (AI) infrastructure. In some implementations, the AI infrastructure is trained to predict outcomes based on data received from the data source, wherein the predicted outcome forms the basis of at least one data interpretation subsequently generated by the data-interpretation system. In some examples, the data interpretation is presented to a user in the form of a simplified textual or graphical representation that allows the user to understand the data interpretation without requiring specialized knowledge or training.