AI Image Defect Commenting for Concrete Inspection Reports

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems for inspecting concrete structures struggle with accurately distinguishing between accurate and inaccurate defect detections, requiring manual effort to prepare inspection reports, as they often mix both types of results, and lack automated generation of appropriate comments and determination ranks.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus using a trained AI model generates comments and individual determination ranks based on defect information and instruction information, displaying text that includes the comment and defect level, considering local government criteria and structural details.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic defect detection is used, then inspection efficiency is improved, but the ability to distinguish accurate from inaccurate detection results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments detection results into multiple categories (accurate detections, false positives, false negatives) and processes each segment differently. The system divides the inspection workflow into separate modules: automatic detection, manual verification, and report generation, allowing each segment to be optimized independently while maintaining overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where inspection workers can mark detection results as accurate or inaccurate, and this feedback is used to refine the automatic detection system. The system continuously learns from worker corrections to improve its detection accuracy over time, resolving the contradiction between automation and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If all detected defects are outputted in a superimposed manner, then system complexity is reduced, but the ease of preparing inspection reports deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidreport preparation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments defect information into structured data fields (location, type, severity, detection confidence) and presents them in an organized manner. Instead of a simple superimposed display, the system creates categorized lists and prioritized views that make report preparation easier while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary sorting and filtering of defect results before presentation to the user. The system pre-ranks detections by accuracy and relevance, and pre-organizes them by location and type, so that when workers prepare reports, they receive already-processed information rather than raw data, significantly easing the report preparation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If manual verification of each defect is required, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidinspection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial manual verification rather than requiring complete manual checking of every defect. The system identifies high-confidence detections that can be automatically accepted and low-confidence detections that require manual review, applying manual action only where necessary. This partial verification approach maintains sufficient accuracy while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service through automated detection and preliminary processing that reduces the manual verification burden. The automatic detection system performs initial analysis and triage, allowing the system to serve itself in filtering and organizing data, while workers only intervene for ambiguous or critical cases, thereby maintaining precision without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250232501A1Image processing apparatus, method and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 CANON KK
  • US20250232501A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232501A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232501A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus that obtains defect information related to a defect detected from a captured image and instruction information for instructing content to include in a comment on the defect generates the comment and a level of the defect as an output result of a trained model that is based on the defect information and the instruction information, and displays text including the comment and the level of the defect.