AI Defect Detection for NDI Using Denoised Feature Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-destructive inspection (NDI) techniques generate vast amounts of complex data that are challenging to evaluate for detecting faults or anomalies, as visual detection of defects is difficult or impossible, necessitating improved methods for anomaly detection in images obtained from NDI scanning.

Innovation Solution

A two-tiered denoising process is implemented for anomaly detection models, involving image-level and patch-level noise elimination, followed by feature matching techniques to pre-train the model using a normal dataset, generating a coreset of representative samples for accurate anomaly detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional visual inspection methods are used to detect defects in NDI images, then the inspection process remains simple and straightforward, but the detection accuracy is insufficient because faults are difficult or impossible to visually detect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary anomaly detection model that acts as a mediator between the complex NDI data and the inspection process. This model automatically identifies anomalies without requiring human visual interpretation, thereby improving detection accuracy while managing complexity through automation rather than direct human analysis of complex data patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical visual inspection process with an automated computational system. Instead of relying on human eyes and manual analysis of complex NDI images, the system uses algorithmic processing and anomaly detection models to automatically identify defects, substituting mechanical human inspection with computational automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a large volume of NDI data is processed to improve detection coverage, then the detection comprehensiveness increases, but the data processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection comprehensivenessVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the most relevant features from the large volume of NDI data. By identifying and focusing on key anomaly-indicating characteristics rather than processing all raw data equally, the system maintains comprehensive detection coverage while reducing the overall processing time and computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary processing and filtering of NDI data before main anomaly detection. By pre-processing the data to identify potential anomaly regions or extract relevant features in advance, the system prepares the data for faster subsequent analysis, thereby maintaining comprehensive detection while reducing the time required for the main detection process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If anomaly detection models are trained with noisy or ambiguous data, then the training process becomes simpler and faster, but the model accuracy and reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary cleaning and validation of training data to remove noisy or ambiguous samples before the actual training process. By pre-processing the dataset to ensure high-quality training examples, the system achieves better model accuracy without significantly increasing training complexity, as the filtering step is straightforward and automated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the training process automatically identifies and handles noisy data through built-in validation and filtering algorithms. The system autonomously manages data quality without requiring extensive manual intervention, thereby maintaining high model accuracy while keeping the training process relatively simple and self-managing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250239054A1Ai based defect detection for non-destructive inspection
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250239054A1 patent drawing
  • US20250239054A1 patent drawing
  • US20250239054A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides methods and techniques for anomaly detecting using feature matching models. A plurality of normal images are received. A plurality of patch features are generated by processing each of the plurality of normal images. A coreset comprising one or more coreset samples is generated, where the one or more coreset samples are selected from the plurality of patch features. A test image is received. One or more test patch features are generated by processing the test image. An anomaly score is generated by comparing the one or more test patch features with the one or more coreset samples.