AI Mentoring Software for Demographic Performance Benchmarking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing financial advisor and insurance agent systems, such as Granum's One Card System, do not adequately address the need for personalized and demographic-specific benchmarking and coaching to improve client-building and performance metrics.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) to compare user data with benchmarks, adjust demographic information, and provide personalized coaching and training based on AI analysis of activity patterns, productivity, and skill sets, including regression models and neural networks, to optimize benchmark scores and improve performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional benchmarking systems are used, then basic performance measurement is provided, but personalized and demographic-specific coaching is not available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of benchmarking by introducing demographic-specific adjustments. Instead of using a single universal benchmark, the system modifies benchmark parameters based on user demographics (age, gender, race, experience level, education, marital status, family status, household income, geographic location, occupation, origin) to create personalized benchmarks for each user, thereby achieving adaptability without requiring a completely new system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If AI analysis is applied to provide personalized coaching, then performance improvement is enhanced, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance improvement efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing demographic-specific benchmark data and performance thresholds before actual analysis is needed. This allows the AI system to quickly compare user performance against pre-prepared demographic benchmarks rather than calculating everything in real-time, reducing processing time while maintaining personalized coaching effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple demographic factors are considered, then coaching accuracy is improved, but data collection and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoaching accuracyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the user population into distinct demographic categories and creates separate benchmark datasets for each segment. By dividing the complex task of analyzing multiple demographic factors into separate, manageable segments, the system can process and store data more efficiently while maintaining high coaching accuracy through targeted analysis of relevant demographic characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250315771A1Financial advisor/insurance agent mentoring software
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 HELGET STEVEN MICHAEL
  • US20250315771A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315771A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315771A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Included in the present disclosure is a method, including obtaining data associated with a metric of a user. In some embodiments, the method includes comparing the data to a benchmark associated with the metric, thereby determining a benchmark score. According to some embodiments, the method includes applying artificial intelligence (AI) to determine a course of action based on the benchmark score and demographic information. The course of action may include i) calibrating the benchmark, ii) determining an activity to adjust future data associated with the metric, or iii) both, so as to modify the benchmark score.