AI Diagram Recommendation Engine for Software Architecture Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human errors in early stages of software development lead to lapses in software architectural diagrams, causing credible violations during interpretation, analysis, development, and quality of software applications, which existing technologies fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

A data processing system utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to analyze software requirements, recommend component placement, data flow, and pipeline sequences, and validate architectural diagrams, generating alerts for discrepancies, thereby creating optimized digital architectural diagram images that align with software requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual creation of software architectural diagrams is performed, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but human errors occur leading to lapses in diagram accuracy and compliance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of software architectural diagramVSAvoidcomplexity of error detection and validation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation by automatically analyzing the software architectural diagram against requirements, detecting discrepancies, and generating compliance reports without human intervention. The machine learning model independently evaluates diagram accuracy, component relationships, and requirement satisfaction, enabling the system to self-correct errors and improve reliability autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If AI and ML techniques are used to analyze software requirements and validate architectural diagrams, then accuracy and compliance are improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of requirement compliance verificationVSAvoidtime for diagram analysis and validation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of software requirements before the architectural diagram is fully created. By pre-processing requirements documents and extracting key constraints early, the system prepares validation rules in advance, enabling faster real-time verification when the diagram is submitted. This reduces the actual validation time while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated AI and ML-based analysis. Instead of human experts manually verifying diagram compliance with requirements, machine learning models automatically perform the verification, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining or improving measurement precision through consistent, rule-based evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If comprehensive validation of software architectural diagrams is performed, then quality and security are enhanced, but effort in later development stages is not sufficiently reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality and security of software applicationVSAvoidefficiency of later development stages
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides immediate feedback on diagram compliance and quality issues before development proceeds. By analyzing the architectural diagram and returning detailed validation results, discrepancy reports, and compliance scores in real-time, the system enables developers to correct issues early in the design phase rather than discovering them during later development or testing stages, thereby improving both quality and overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11662982B1Intelligent recommendation for creation of software architectural diagrams
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11662982B1 patent drawing
  • US11662982B1 patent drawing
  • US11662982B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An architectural diagram recommendation engine is implemented in a data processing system for software architectural diagram analysis and recommendation. The architectural diagram recommendation engine analyzes a software requirements specification document using natural language processing to identify functional requirements and security requirements. The architectural diagram recommendation engine analyzes a digital software architectural diagram image to identify functional components and identifies one or more discrepancies between the functional components of the digital software architectural diagram image and the functional requirements or security requirements. The architectural diagram recommendation engine generates an alert concerning the one or more discrepancies and presents the alert in association with the digital software architectural diagram image.