AI Disease Subclassification With Two-Stage ICD-10 Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical regulatory and legal frameworks require extensive clinical trials and mapping to ICD-10 codes for autonomous AI systems, making it difficult to use clinically relevant disease categories without going through rigorous regulatory hurdles.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage AI system is developed, comprising a diagnostic model for clinical diagnosis and a sub-classification model to map outputs to hierarchical coding systems like ICD-10, allowing for clinically relevant disease subclassification without requiring new studies, using machine learning to generate sub-classifications within existing frameworks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fully-autonomous AI diagnosis system is used that diagnoses in a dichotomous manner (severity less than vs severity at least), then clinically relevant disease categories can be diagnosed, but the output does not map to ICD-10 codes requiring immense regulatory hurdles and huge expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical relevance of diagnosisVSAvoidregulatory complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI system is segmented into two distinct models: a diagnostic model that provides clinically relevant dichotomous diagnoses, and a sub-classification model that maps outputs to ICD-10 codes. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in its specific function, resolving the contradiction between clinical relevance and regulatory compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sub-classification model acts as an intermediary between the diagnostic model's clinically relevant output and the ICD-10 coding system. It translates the dichotomous clinical diagnoses into hierarchical ICD-10 codes without requiring the diagnostic model itself to be retrained or validated against ICD-10, thus reducing regulatory hurdles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If mapping to ICD-10 is required for regulatory compliance, then hierarchical coding framework is satisfied, but clinically less relevant or even not relevant diagnoses are output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidclinical relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the clinical diagnosis function from the coding function. The diagnostic model maintains clinical relevance by outputting dichotomous diagnoses, while the sub-classification model handles ICD-10 mapping for regulatory compliance. This ensures both reliability for regulation and ease of operation for clinical use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution adds another dimension to the output by creating a hierarchical structure where the primary diagnostic output remains clinically relevant, and a secondary ICD-10 classification layer is added for regulatory purposes. This dimensional addition satisfies both clinical and regulatory requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a new AI system is built to diagnose various ICD-10 categories for DRD and DME, then ICD-10 mapping is achieved, but it would not be clinically very relevant and would require much larger N for confirmatory studies

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveICD-10 mapping accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The sub-classification model is trained preliminarily on existing data to learn the mapping between clinical diagnoses and ICD-10 codes. This preliminary training allows the system to achieve ICD-10 mapping accuracy without requiring extensive new clinical trials, as the mapping relationships can be learned from existing labeled data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of building a completely new AI system for ICD-10 diagnosis, the solution copies the output structure of the diagnostic model and applies a transformation layer (sub-classification model) that maps to ICD-10 codes. This copying approach maintains clinical relevance while achieving regulatory mapping without requiring much larger N for confirmatory studies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250238926A1Artificial intelligence enabled sub-classifications of disease states
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 DIGITAL DIAGNOSTICS INC
  • US20250238926A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238926A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238926A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fully autonomous system is used to subclassify a disease in a patient. For example, a tool receives one or more images of a body part of a patient, inputs the one or more images into a diagnostic model, and receives, as output from the diagnostic model, a diagnosis for the patient. The tool determines whether the diagnosis is positive for a given disease, and, responsive to determining that the diagnosis is positive, inputs a representation of the one or more images into a diagnosis subclassification model. The tool determines, based on output from the diagnosis subclassification model, a subclassification for the diagnosis, and outputs a control signal based on the subclassification.