AI Document Annotation System for Review Feedback Consolidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for document review meetings face challenges in accurately capturing and consolidating feedback and suggested edits from participants, as they often rely on manual note-taking and handwritten comments, which can lead to inconsistencies and inefficiencies in incorporating feedback into the original document.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing artificial intelligence to identify and generate annotations for content suggestions from various sources, including physical and electronic documents, and media content, allowing for automatic recognition and integration of feedback into the document, enabling efficient correlation and display of suggested edits within a digital interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual note-taking and handwritten comments are used to capture feedback during document review meetings, then participants can provide suggestions, but the accuracy and consistency of capturing and consolidating feedback deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of providing feedbackVSAvoidaccuracy of capturing feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical note-taking and handwritten comments with an automated electronic system using optical character recognition (OCR), image processing, and natural language processing to capture, recognize, and consolidate feedback from various sources including handwritten notes, printed comments, and digital annotations, thereby maintaining ease of operation while significantly improving accuracy and consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated processing system that acts as a mediator between participants providing feedback and the document revision process. This intermediary system captures feedback from multiple sources, processes it through OCR and image recognition, and consolidates it into a unified format, ensuring accurate and consistent capture without requiring participants to change their natural feedback-providing behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If multiple sources of feedback are collected during document review, then comprehensive input is obtained, but the complexity of consolidating and correlating suggestions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of feedbackVSAvoidcomplexity of consolidating feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex consolidation process into distinct automated stages: capturing feedback from multiple sources, processing each source type through appropriate recognition algorithms (OCR for printed text, image processing for handwritten notes), extracting structured data, and consolidating into a unified format. This segmentation reduces overall complexity by making each step manageable and automated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal multi-functional processing system that can handle various types of feedback sources (handwritten notes, printed comments, digital annotations) through a single integrated platform. The system uses multiple recognition algorithms and processing methods within one unified architecture, reducing the need for separate systems for each feedback type and thereby reducing overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated processing is used to identify and integrate feedback, then efficiency of document review improves, but the complexity of the processing system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of document reviewVSAvoidcomplexity of processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service automated processing system that autonomously captures, processes, and consolidates feedback without requiring manual intervention. The system automatically identifies feedback sources, applies appropriate recognition algorithms, extracts relevant information, and integrates suggestions into the document revision process, thereby improving efficiency while managing complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where the processed information is continuously refined and validated. The system uses recognition results to improve subsequent processing, validates extracted data against expected formats, and allows for iterative refinement of the consolidation process, thereby improving efficiency while managing complexity through controlled feedback mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11263384B2Generating document edit requests for electronic documents managed by a third-party document management service using artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 RICOH CO LTD
  • US11263384B2 patent drawing
  • US11263384B2 patent drawing
  • US11263384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Artificial intelligence is introduced into document review to identify content suggestions from input to generate suggested annotations for the reviewed document. An approach is provided for receiving an electronic document that contains original content from an original electronic document for review and electronic mark-ups provided by a first user. One or more electronic mark-ups that represent content suggestions proposed by the first user are identified from the electronic document. For each electronic mark-up of the one or more electronic mark-ups identified a document portion of the original content that corresponds to the electronic mark-up is identified, and an annotation is generated for the electronic mark-up comprising the electronic mark-up and a first user ID for the first user and associating the annotation to the document portion identified. The original content with one or more annotations generated from the one or more electronic mark-ups is displayed, in electronic form, within a display window.