AI Document Comparison via Layout Segmentation and Difference Matrix

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional document comparison tools are limited in accurately identifying changes, handling complex documents with formatting and multimedia elements, and adapting to industry-specific requirements, and struggle with multilingual content, leading to errors and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system using an AI model to preprocess documents into a structured format, generate a layout, determine sections, and create a textual difference matrix, highlighting alterations in a standardized and user-friendly manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional document comparison tools are used, then the comparison process is simple and fast, but accuracy in identifying changes deteriorates due to invisible text layers and complex formatting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in identifying changesVSAvoidcomplexity of comparison system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the document comparison process into multiple distinct modules: preprocessing module for standardizing input documents, invisible element detection module for identifying hidden text layers, formatting analysis module for handling complex layouts, and difference identification module for pinpointing specific changes. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in one aspect, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary AI model that acts as a mediator between the raw document data and the comparison logic. This AI model preprocesses documents to extract meaningful features, normalize formatting variations, and filter out irrelevant invisible elements before the actual comparison occurs, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring the comparison algorithm itself to become overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual inspection is used for document comparison, then flexibility in handling different document types is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of document comparisonVSAvoidflexibility in handling document types
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal document comparison system that can handle multiple document types (text documents, tables, images with text, multilingual documents) through a single integrated platform. The system uses format-agnostic preprocessing and AI-based feature extraction that adapts to different document structures automatically, eliminating the need for separate manual processes for each document type while maintaining the flexibility to handle diverse formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service mechanisms where the AI model automatically detects document type, selects appropriate processing parameters, and adjusts comparison criteria without user intervention. This automation maintains flexibility in handling different document types while dramatically improving productivity by eliminating manual configuration and inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If traditional tools highlight differences without analysis, then the process is straightforward, but loss of information occurs due to lack of contextual insights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention of contextual informationVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system not only identifies differences but also analyzes their context and provides reasoned explanations. The AI model evaluates the significance of detected changes, cross-references them with document structure and content, and returns enriched results that include contextual information about why differences matter, thereby minimizing information loss while using feedback loops to manage system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds an analytical dimension to the traditional difference-highlighting approach. Instead of merely displaying visual differences, the system introduces a layer of semantic analysis that interprets the meaning and context of changes. This dimensional expansion from visual comparison to contextual understanding retains critical information while using structured analysis frameworks to manage the increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20240320423A1System and method for comparing documents using an artificial intelligence (AI) model
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 UST GLOBAL PTE LTD
  • US20240320423A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320423A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320423A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for comparing documents using an AI model is disclosed herein. The method includes preprocessing a plurality of input documents into a structured, standardized format for comparison. Further, the method includes generating a layout of components in the plurality of input documents. Furthermore, the method includes generating a canonical representation indicating relationships between the components. Furthermore, the method includes determining sections within each of the plurality of input documents by segmenting the layout Furthermore, the method includes determining a textual difference matrix using the AI model, based on the comparison of the plurality of sections within each of the plurality of input documents, wherein the textual difference matrix indicates alterations in one or more expressions in each of the plurality of sections.