AI Domain Validation Using Embeddings for Real-Time Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional output validation processes in institutions are labor-intensive, prone to errors, and difficult to navigate due to the complexity of documentation like MDDs and MVDs, which are crucial for ensuring compliance with institution-specific rules.

Innovation Solution

A validation system using large language models (LLMs) for automatic validation operations, trained through transfer learning and domain-specific data sets, allows for real-time compliance checks and query responses, including intelligent storage and management of historical documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review of output is performed by managers, supervisors, or quality control agents, then validation can be conducted, but the process becomes labor-intensive and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual review process with an automated validation system that uses natural language processing, machine learning models, and rule-based engines to perform compliance validation automatically, eliminating the need for manual human review while maintaining or improving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system enables self-service by automatically validating outputs against institutional rules and guidelines without requiring human intervention, allowing the system to serve itself in performing compliance checks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual review of output is performed, then validation can be conducted, but the process is prone to errors due to varying levels of scrutiny by different reviewers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance validationVSAvoidvalidation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the validation process from subjective human judgment to objective computational evaluation by changing the parameters of validation from human discretion to standardized algorithmic rules, ensuring consistent application of compliance criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system provides universal application of compliance rules across all outputs and reviewers, ensuring that the same institutional guidelines are applied consistently regardless of who or what performs the validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If documentation such as MDDs and MVDs is created manually, then model development and validation can be documented, but the likelihood of errors increases and the documents become dense and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetraceabilityVSAvoiddocumentation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically generating MDDs and MVDs during the model development process itself, rather than creating them separately afterward, ensuring traceability is maintained from the outset while reducing manual effort and errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system creates and maintains copies of relevant information across multiple documents automatically, ensuring consistency and traceability without requiring manual replication, thereby reducing errors and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Loss of information

If historical documents are stored in full form, then complete information is preserved, but storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext preservationVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential contextual information from historical documents that is necessary for validation purposes, storing these extracted elements rather than complete documents, thereby preserving necessary context while reducing storage requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system segments historical documents into discrete, manageable units of contextual information that can be stored and retrieved independently, reducing overall storage requirements while maintaining access to necessary context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250252139A1Artificial intelligence driven domain-specific validation system
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250252139A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252139A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252139A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for efficiently handling queries. An example method includes receiving a query from a user device and generating an embedding representation of the query. The example method further includes performing a similarity comparison between the embedding representation of the query and a set of embedding representations of historical document sections stored in a historical document repository and selecting a relevant embedding representation of a historical document section stored in the historical document repository for the query. The example method further includes querying a target large language model using the embedding representation of the query and the relevant embedding representation of the historical document section and providing a query response to the user device.