AI Driver Assistance Alerts for End-to-End Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving technologies face challenges in scalability, safety, and reliability due to the need for massive volumes of training data, high costs, and limitations in generalizing to diverse and unfamiliar driving scenarios, particularly in handling corner and edge cases such as extreme weather and unexpected road hazards.

Innovation Solution

An end-to-end (E2E) neural network approach for autonomous driving that uses imitation learning and memory-augmented transformers to process sensory inputs and generate prescriptive steering and speed control actions, reducing dependency on complex map data and enabling context-aware learning, thereby improving scalability and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional autonomous driving systems use aggregation of independent submodules with manually labelled data, then the system can achieve basic driving functions, but the training data volume required becomes enormous and the cost becomes expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and reliabilityVSAvoidtraining data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent submodule approaches into a unified end-to-end neural network architecture that processes sensory inputs directly to generate driving actions. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate manual labelling of data for each submodule, reducing overall data requirements while maintaining or improving safety and reliability through integrated learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses imitation learning to copy human driving behavior patterns from demonstration data rather than requiring exhaustive manual labelling of all possible driving scenarios. By learning from relatively small sets of demonstrated driving sequences, the system achieves reliable performance without needing enormous volumes of manually annotated training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional autonomous driving systems use pre-built maps and manual labelling, then the system can operate in familiar environments, but the cost of construction and labelling becomes expensive and generalizability to unfamiliar scenarios is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralizability to unfamiliar scenariosVSAvoidcost of construction and labelling
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The end-to-end neural network system performs self-service by automatically learning driving policies from raw demonstration data without requiring expensive manual labelling or pre-built map construction. The system generalizes to unfamiliar scenarios by learning underlying driving principles from diverse demonstration sequences, enabling adaptation to new environments without additional annotation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental parameters of data representation and processing by using raw sensory inputs and demonstration trajectories directly, rather than converting them into manually labelled categories or pre-built map structures. This parameter change enables both reduced costs and improved generalizability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If end-to-end neural network is trained using imitation learning, then the system can learn from human driving demonstrations, but challenges remain in validating and testing the model and achieving regulatory safety standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidvalidation and testing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms including counterfactual reasoning that analyzes what actions should have been taken in hazardous situations, safety validation that checks model outputs against safety criteria, and attention visualization that provides interpretability. These feedback loops enable efficient validation and testing of the imitation learning model, helping achieve regulatory safety standards while maintaining high learning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250002032A1System And Methods For Providing Driver Assistance Alerts Using An End-To-End Artificially Intelligent Collision Avoidance System And Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 HYPRLABS INC
  • US20250002032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250002032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250002032A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology disclosed teaches a system and methods for providing driver assistance alerts to a driver using an end-to-end artificially-intelligent advanced driver assistance system. The technology disclosed further includes receiving environmental data for a sequence of driving states including at least video from a camera, returns from an optical sensor, and location data from a GNSS receiver, wherein the camera, the optical sensor, and the GNSS receiver are coupled to a processor carried by a vehicle, processing the environmental data as input to an end-to-end neural network, wherein the end-to-end neural network is trained to generate prescriptive steering and speed control actions in response to a present driving state, analyzing hidden layer data and output data from the end-to-end neural network to estimate collision avoidance data, and presenting, to the driver, a user interface including driver assistance alerts based on the collision avoidance data.