AI Model Predicting Drug Indications for Unknown Substances

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting drug indications in humans are limited, as they can only predict efficacies of substances with known effects, failing to account for substances with unknown efficacies used in training data.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an artificial intelligence model trained with three data sets: one set containing biomarker dynamics from non-human animals administered with known substances, another with substance names linked to their indications, and a third with adverse events, allowing prediction of indications for substances without prior known efficacies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional AI models are trained only with known substance indications, then prediction accuracy for known substances is maintained, but the model cannot predict indications for substances with unknown efficacies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction capability for unknown substancesVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary substance with unknown indication as a bridge between known substances. By training the AI model with this intermediary substance that has no known indication, the model learns to predict indications for completely unknown substances while maintaining reliability through the gradual transition from known to unknown indications in the training sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training the AI model with substances of known indications before introducing substances with unknown indications. This staged approach allows the model to first establish baseline prediction capabilities with reliable data, then progressively adapt to predict indications for unknown substances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If more comprehensive training data including unknown efficacy substances is used, then prediction capability is improved, but training data quality and reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction capability for unknown substancesVSAvoidtraining data quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training data into distinct categories: substances with known indications, intermediary substances with unknown indications, and test substances. This segmentation allows the model to learn different patterns from each category while maintaining overall data quality, as each segment serves a specific training purpose without contaminating the others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the indication status parameter of training substances from 'known' to 'unknown' in a controlled manner. By systematically varying this parameter across different training subsets, the model learns to handle both known and unknown indications while maintaining measurement precision through controlled parameter transitions rather than random data quality degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional clinical trial processes are followed, then regulatory approval is achieved, but time and cost are excessively high with >80% dropout rate in phases I-III

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory approval probabilityVSAvoiddrug development time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by using the AI model to predict indications and filter candidate substances before initiating expensive Phase I-III clinical trials. This pre-screening process identifies the most promising substances with highest predicted indication match, thereby reducing the number of substances that need to proceed to costly clinical trials and minimizing the 80% dropout loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables skipping of certain traditional trial phases by using AI-predicted indication information to accelerate the drug development process. Substances with high-confidence AI predictions may bypass some preliminary screening steps or proceed more quickly through trial phases, reducing overall development time while maintaining regulatory approval probability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20240153649A1Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Indications for Test Substances in Humans
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 KARYDO THERAPEUTIX INC
  • US20240153649A1 patent drawing
  • US20240153649A1 patent drawing
  • US20240153649A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method for predicting an indication for a test substance in humans, a prediction device for predicting an indication for a test substance in humans, a computer program for predicting an indication for a test substance in humans, and a prediction system for predicting an indication for a test substance in humans.