AI ECG Screening for Early Low Ejection Fraction Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for diagnosing low ejection fraction (EF) rely on expensive and specialized procedures like transthoracic echocardiograms, which are often not performed until symptoms appear, creating a care gap and preventing early intervention for cardiovascular diseases.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing artificial intelligence models, particularly ensemble models, to analyze electrocardiogram (ECG) data to detect low EF, incorporating multiple models to aggregate predictions and adjust for patient characteristics, enabling accurate and equitable detection of undiagnosed cardiovascular conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional diagnostic methods (transthoracic echocardiograms) are used to detect low ejection fraction, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase, and accessibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of low EFVSAvoidcomplexity of diagnostic procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses AI models to create a virtual copy of the complex echocardiogram diagnostic process. Instead of requiring actual echocardiogram equipment and specialized operators, the system uses trained AI models that can predict ejection fraction from simpler ECG data, effectively copying the diagnostic capability without the complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/equipment-based diagnostic system (echocardiogram machines requiring specialized operators) with an information-processing system (AI models analyzing ECG data). This substitution eliminates the need for complex hardware while maintaining diagnostic precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If conventional diagnostic methods are used, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases as procedures are not performed until symptoms appear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of low EFVSAvoidtime delay in diagnosis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of low ejection fraction using routinely collected ECG data before symptoms manifest. By continuously monitoring ECG data and applying AI models, the system can identify at-risk patients early, enabling preventive intervention before clinical symptoms appear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent leverages existing ECG data that is already being collected for routine cardiac monitoring, making the diagnostic system self-service. The ECG data serves dual purposes: routine monitoring and early detection of low EF, eliminating the need for separate diagnostic procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If AI models are used to detect low EF from ECG data, then accessibility and ease of operation are improved, but measurement precision may worsen compared to conventional methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of diagnostic serviceVSAvoiddetection accuracy of low EF
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple AI models into an ensemble system where each model processes ECG data independently and their predictions are combined. This merging approach aggregates the strengths of individual models, improving overall accuracy while maintaining ease of operation through automated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the AI models are continuously trained and refined using validated ECG data and clinical outcomes. This feedback loop ensures that the models maintain high precision by learning from actual diagnostic results and adjusting their predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If a single AI model is used to determine low EF score, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability worsens due to model variability and bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of AI modelsVSAvoidconsistency of low EF detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple AI models with different architectures and training approaches into an ensemble system. By aggregating predictions from multiple models, the system reduces the impact of any single model's biases or errors, thereby improving reliability and consistency of low EF detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters and thresholds based on patient characteristics and model performance metrics. This parameter optimization ensures consistent and reliable detection across different patient populations, compensating for potential model biases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260060658A1Detecting low ejection fraction from electrocardiogram data using artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 TEMPUS AI INC
  • US20260060658A1 patent drawing
  • US20260060658A1 patent drawing
  • US20260060658A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for detecting low ejection fraction (EF) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using artificial intelligence (AI) are disclosed. ECG data is obtained for a patient. The ECG data is provided as input to a plurality of trained AI models, wherein each trained AI model is trained to determine a score of low EF based on the ECG data. A score of low EF is determined using each trained AI model based on the ECG data. An overall score of low EF is determined based on a combination of the scores of low EF determined by each of the trained AI models. An operating point threshold is obtained for the patient based on a plurality of patient characteristics. The overall score of low EF is compared to the operating point threshold. A low EF prediction is made for the patient based on the comparison.