AI Energy Flow Control Using Adaptive Simulation Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional energy flow management systems fail to account for local user behavior and system behavior, leading to inefficiencies in energy management.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method utilizing a simulation model customized by configuration data and trained by an artificial intelligence algorithm to optimize energy flows in controllable devices, incorporating self-learning algorithms like genetic programming to adapt to user and system changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional energy flow management systems are used, then basic energy distribution is achieved, but user behavior and system behavior are not taken into account leading to inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy system efficiencyVSAvoidadaptation to user behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by training AI algorithms with measurement data from actual user behavior and system operation. The simulation model is continuously updated to reflect changing user patterns and system characteristics, allowing the energy management system to adapt its control strategies in real-time rather than relying on static conventional approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-learning through AI algorithms that automatically analyze measurement data from the energy system and user behavior patterns. The simulation model self-updates without external intervention, and the trained AI controllers autonomously optimize energy flows based on learned patterns, reducing the need for manual configuration and improving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If AI algorithms are used to train individual target value controllers, then energy flow optimization is improved, but computing resources and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy flow optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the energy management system into modular components: a simulation model, individual target value controllers for each controllable device, and AI training algorithms. Each controller is trained independently on specific measurement data, allowing parallel processing and reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining optimization effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a simulation model that replicates the actual energy system behavior. This virtual copy allows AI algorithms to be trained on simulated data alongside real measurement data without risking actual system disruption. The simulation model serves as a safe testing environment that reduces the complexity of direct real-time optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250337242A1Energy Flow Management System
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 FRONIUS INT GMBH
  • US20250337242A1 patent drawing
  • US20250337242A1 patent drawing
  • US20250337242A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for optimizing energy flows of controllable devices within an energy system, the method comprising the steps of: customizing a simulation model of the energy system on the basis of configuration data; training by an artificial intelligence algorithm individual target value controllers associated with controllable devices of the energy system based on measurement data and/or based on generic default data using the customized simulation model of said energy system; calculating by the trained target value controllers target values for the associated controllable devices of the energy system; and controlling energy flow related functions of the controllable devices of said energy system in response to the target values calculated by the trained target value controllers for the respective controllable devices.