AI Entity Classification Taxonomy Framework

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing entity classification methods using artificial intelligence models face challenges such as instability in classification results, lack of professional knowledge, and inability to manage complex real-world customer requirements, leading to inefficient network security measures.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an AI classification model using a defined taxonomy framework, where the classification system iteratively generates prompts to the AI model based on device properties, allowing for accurate and granular classification of entities within a network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing AI models are used for entity classification, then classification can be performed, but the classification results are unstable and lack reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification result stabilityVSAvoidtime for taxonomy management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining a comprehensive taxonomy framework with hierarchical categories before classification occurs. This pre-structured framework guides the AI model through predetermined classification paths, ensuring stable and reliable results while reducing the need for time-consuming taxonomy management adjustments during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where classification results are validated against the predefined taxonomy framework. If inconsistencies arise, the system can adjust or request reclassification, ensuring reliability. The feedback loop also allows continuous refinement of classification decisions without requiring manual taxonomy restructuring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If existing AI models are used for entity classification, then classification can be performed, but the models lack professional knowledge and cannot handle complex real-world requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle complex device propertiesVSAvoidtaxonomy management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the classification task into hierarchical levels (e.g., device type, function, protocol, vendor) within the taxonomy framework. This segmentation allows the AI model to handle complex device properties systematically by classifying one attribute at a time, improving adaptability while managing complexity through structured decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The predefined taxonomy framework serves multiple functions: it provides classification structure, validates AI outputs, guides prompt generation, and ensures consistency across different classification scenarios. This multi-functionality enhances the model's ability to handle complex requirements without proportionally increasing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If manual taxonomy management is performed, then classification accuracy can be maintained, but time and labor requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification speedVSAvoidtaxonomy management effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by using the AI model to automatically perform classification tasks based on the predefined taxonomy framework. The model generates its own prompts and makes classification decisions autonomously, eliminating the need for manual taxonomy management while maintaining accuracy. The framework itself serves the system's classification needs without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical taxonomy management with an automated AI-based system. The AI model processes device information, generates classification prompts, and assigns categories automatically, substituting human labor with intelligent automation. This maintains classification accuracy while dramatically improving productivity and reducing operational effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250150476A1Artificial intelligence (AI) driven classifier using defined taxonomy framework
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250150476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150476A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for entity classification via an artificial intelligence model using a defined taxonomy framework are described. Entity classification includes generating a first query for a classification model, the first query including a first set of options for classification of an entity at a first classification granularity level of a taxonomy framework, providing the first query comprising the first set of options for classification to the classification model, receiving, from the classification model, a selection of one or more options of the first set of options for classification, and determining a classification of the entity based at least in part on the selection of the one or more options of the first set of options.