AI Event Prediction for Collections and Cash Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional event-driven systems in computer applications, particularly in accounting and collections processes, face inefficiencies due to reactive and manually intensive approaches, leading to delayed cash flow management and reduced productivity, as they fail to consider dynamic parameters and timely feedback loops.

Innovation Solution

The integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to analyze historical data and predict timely responses, enabling proactive event handling and personalized dunning strategies, which can automate recommendations for improved collections processes and cash flow management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional reactive event-driven systems are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity and response timeliness deteriorate due to manual intensive approaches and delayed cash flow management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollections outputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using machine learning models to predict customer payment behavior and generate personalized dunning strategies in advance. The AI system analyzes historical data and customer characteristics before collection actions are needed, preparing optimized communication tactics and timing predictions proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical collection processes are replaced with an automated AI-driven system. The patent substitutes human-intensive reactive event handling with machine learning models that automatically analyze data, predict outcomes, and generate personalized communication strategies, thereby increasing productivity while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If traditional manual event handling is used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but time consumption increases leading to delayed cash flow management

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDays Sales OutstandingVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the AI model to autonomously analyze customer data, predict payment behavior, and generate personalized dunning strategies without human intervention. The machine learning system serves itself by continuously learning from historical outcomes and automatically optimizing collection approaches, reducing time loss while managing automation complexity internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where actual collection outcomes are fed back into the machine learning model to continuously improve predictions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from historical data and refine its timing predictions and strategy recommendations, reducing Days Sales Outstanding through data-driven optimization while maintaining manageable automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If generic collection strategies are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but effectiveness deteriorates due to lack of personalized approaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollections effectivenessVSAvoidstrategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring collection strategies to individual customer characteristics and behaviors. Instead of uniform generic approaches, the AI model analyzes specific customer data points and generates personalized communication tactics optimized for each customer's payment patterns, preferences, and risk profile, thereby improving reliability while managing complexity through targeted personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters based on customer-specific data analysis. The machine learning model adjusts communication timing, frequency, tone, and channel preferences according to individual customer characteristics. These parameter changes are automatically optimized for each customer segment, improving collection effectiveness while maintaining manageable strategy complexity through systematic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11410181B2Event prediction using artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 HIGHRADIUS CORP
  • US11410181B2 patent drawing
  • US11410181B2 patent drawing
  • US11410181B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided techniques manage and predict future events. For example, in a payment implementation, a supplier, at any given point in time, has multiple customer debtors that may owe payments (e.g., have outstanding invoices). Utilizing historical attributes for a given customer debtor payment predictions may be determined. By analyzing outstanding debts associated with this debtor customer an amount owed may be calculated and a predicted payment (e.g., a payment that has not yet been indicated by that debtor customer) created. Events may be provided to a second system to correlate predictions across multiple debtor collectors. Correlated information may be used to predict cash flow needs of an organization. Alternatively, optimization of help desk systems may be provided based on predictions from analysis of multiple events in an Event-driven feed back system. Provided techniques may be generalized to other applications as well.