Automated Factsheet Generation for AI Question Answering Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data processing techniques lack the ability to generate equivalent AI factsheets for artificial intelligence-based tools like TableQA systems, which are essential for standardizing comparisons, promoting trust, and ensuring transparency and fairness in model reusability.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for generating factsheets for AI-based question answering systems, utilizing a Universal Test Engine (UTE) to evaluate TableQA systems on tabular data, producing accuracy values, addressable queries, and human-readable summaries, along with APIs for improving system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional data processing approaches are used, then processing speed is maintained, but the ability to generate AI factsheets for TableQA systems is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to generate AI factsheetsVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal evaluation framework that can process multiple types of AI systems (TableQA, chatbots, image generators) through a common architecture. The system uses standardized templates and metrics that adapt to different AI modalities, allowing one system to serve multiple evaluation purposes without requiring separate processing pipelines for each AI type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is divided into modular components: template generation modules, evaluation metric modules, and reporting modules. Each component handles specific aspects of the evaluation process independently, allowing the system to generate AI factsheets for different system types by activating relevant modules while maintaining overall system manageability despite increased functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive evaluation metrics are generated, then accuracy assessment improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy valuesVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates evaluation templates and selects appropriate metrics before actual evaluation begins. By preparing the evaluation framework in advance with predetermined templates for different AI system types, the system avoids time-consuming ad-hoc metric selection during execution, thus maintaining high measurement precision while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a tiered evaluation approach where essential accuracy metrics are always computed, while additional comprehensive metrics are calculated only when needed or when resources permit. This allows the system to maintain baseline measurement precision efficiently while offering optional comprehensive analysis that can be activated based on time and resource availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If detailed query analysis is performed, then system capability understanding improves, but computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capability informationVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential capability information needed for AI factsheets from comprehensive query analysis. Instead of processing and storing all possible query details, the system identifies and extracts key capability indicators (such as supported query types, accuracy patterns, and system strengths/weaknesses) that capture system capabilities while minimizing computational overhead for information extraction and storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20230169363A1Automatically generating factsheets for artificial intelligence-based question answering systems
Publication Date: 2023.06.01 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20230169363A1 patent drawing
  • US20230169363A1 patent drawing
  • US20230169363A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer program products for automatically generating factsheets for artificial intelligence-based question answering systems are provided herein. A computer-implemented method includes processing at least one given artificial intelligence-based question answering system on tabular data using at least one test engine; generating, based on the processing, accuracy values attributed to the at least one given artificial intelligence-based question answering system in connection with particular tabular data; generating, based on the processing, a set of queries determined to be addressable by the at least one given artificial intelligence-based question answering system on the particular tabular data; generating, based on the accuracy values and the queries determined to be addressable, at least one human-readable summary of the at least one given artificial intelligence-based question answering system; and performing one or more automated actions based on the at least one human-readable summary.