AI Workflow Optimization for Farm-Level Food Waste

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The farm-level food waste market lacks advanced technology for efficient logistics and decision-making, relying solely on buyers' opinions and preferences.

Innovation Solution

An AI-powered workflow optimization platform that utilizes artificial intelligence for material valorization, image processing to verify produce imperfections, and a supply chain optimization algorithm to optimize logistics and reduce waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If AI and image processing are integrated into the marketplace platform, then produce verification accuracy and logistics efficiency are improved, but system complexity and implementation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduce verification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an AI-powered image processing system as an intermediary between farmers and buyers. This intermediary automatically verifies produce quality by analyzing images uploaded by farmers, extracting features such as color, texture, and defect detection. The AI system acts as a neutral third party that objectively assesses produce quality, eliminating the need for manual inspection by marketplace staff while providing transparent verification to both farmers and buyers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual produce inspection and verification processes with automated AI-based image processing. Instead of relying on human experts to physically examine and grade produce, the system uses computer vision algorithms to analyze images, detect imperfections, and determine produce quality. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated intelligent systems significantly improves verification accuracy and consistency while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual annotation by expert teams is used to train AI, then data accuracy and model reliability are improved, but time consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel reliabilityVSAvoidtraining data preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a systematic preliminary action approach where expert teams manually annotate a representative subset of training data before deploying the AI system at scale. Experts in agriculture and food science pre-label images with accurate produce types, quality grades, and defect categories. This preliminary annotation of a carefully selected dataset provides high-quality training examples that enable the AI model to learn accurate classification and verification patterns, reducing the need for extensive manual annotation later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by having experts annotate only a strategic subset of the total training data rather than every single image. The expert team focuses on annotating diverse representative samples covering different produce types, quality levels, and defect variations. This partial expert annotation, combined with automated labeling for the remaining data, achieves high model reliability while significantly reducing the time and resource investment required for complete manual annotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If mathematical optimization with hyper-customized decomposition is implemented, then logistics optimization and waste reduction are improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogistics efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by decomposing the complex logistics optimization problem into distinct modular components. The system separates produce matching (connecting farmers with buyers), route optimization (determining transportation paths), inventory management (tracking produce availability), and demand forecasting (predicting buyer needs) as independent optimization modules. Each module can be processed separately using appropriate algorithms, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining comprehensive logistics optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting optimization parameters based on real-time data. The system modifies key parameters such as produce freshness thresholds, delivery time windows, transportation cost coefficients, and demand prediction weights according to current market conditions, weather patterns, and produce characteristics. This dynamic parameter adjustment enables the optimization algorithm to adapt to changing conditions without requiring complete re-computation, improving logistics efficiency while managing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12307406B2AI-powered workflow optimization for farm-level food waste
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 BETAFELD LLC
  • US12307406B2 patent drawing
  • US12307406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of the present disclosure relate to workflow optimization for farm level food waste. A method includes employing a material database design for identifying new uses for food waste. The method further includes image processing for verifying aesthetic imperfections of produce, and supply chain optimization for addressing supply chain challenges.