AI Fraud Detection Across Payment Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Financial institutions face challenges in detecting cross-channel fraud due to conventional methods' limitations, which often focus on single-channel approaches, leading to inefficiencies in resource allocation and hindered ability to track fraudulent activities across multiple channels, resulting in increased financial losses.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of artificial intelligence machines organized into parallel sets of predictive models, trained with supervised and unsupervised data, integrating classifiers like neural networks, case-based reasoning, and smart agents, to provide real-time cross-channel fraud detection and prevention by sharing suspicious activity data across all financial channels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional single-channel fraud detection methods are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but fraud detection effectiveness across multiple channels deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple independent predictive models, each specialized for a specific payment channel (e.g., online banking, mobile banking, ATM). Each model is trained on channel-specific data and can independently detect fraud patterns in its designated channel, improving overall detection effectiveness while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The parallel predictive models are designed with universal functionality to handle multiple payment channels. Each model can process and analyze data from various channels, and the system as a whole provides comprehensive cross-channel fraud detection by integrating results from all models, enabling a single system to address fraud across diverse payment environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If single-channel fraud detection approaches are used, then resource allocation is simplified, but the ability to track fraudulent activities across multiple channels deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud tracking capabilityVSAvoidresource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments fraud tracking responsibilities across multiple specialized models, each focused on specific payment channels. This segmentation enables efficient resource allocation by assigning computational resources to channel-specific models based on their individual needs, while the integrated system maintains comprehensive tracking capability across all channels by aggregating results from each segmented model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If real-time cross-channel fraud detection is implemented, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but computational resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The computational workload is segmented across multiple parallel predictive models, each processing data for specific payment channels independently. This segmentation allows for efficient utilization of computational resources by distributing processing tasks across available hardware, enabling real-time analysis without concentrating all computational demands in a single system component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial processing by analyzing only the most relevant features and data points for each payment channel through specialized models. Rather than processing all possible data uniformly across channels, each model focuses on channel-specific patterns and anomalies, reducing overall computational resource consumption while maintaining high detection accuracy for each channel type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11763310B2Method of reducing financial losses in multiple payment channels upon a recognition of fraud first appearing in any one payment channel
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 BRIGHTERION INC
  • US11763310B2 patent drawing
  • US11763310B2 patent drawing
  • US11763310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of reducing financial fraud by operating artificial intelligence machines organized into parallel sets of predictive models with each set specially trained with supervised and unsupervised training data filtered for a particular financial channel. Each set integrates several artificial intelligence classifiers like neural networks, case based reasoning, decision trees, genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic, business rules and constraints, smart agents and associated real-time profiling, recursive profiles, and long-term profiles. Suspicious and abnormal activities in any channel communicate across predictive models for all the financial channels through real-time memory storage updates to the smart agent profiles they all share.