AI Problem Gambling Detection Using Transaction Pattern Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying problematic gambling behavior, especially in online gambling, are ineffective due to reliance on simplistic rule-based systems, biased self-assessment, and lack of individualized approaches, often failing to detect issues in a timely and accurate manner.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using artificial intelligence to analyze gaming transaction data, employing risk behavior markers and machine learning to detect problem gambling behavior in real-time, which aligns with human expert assessments and provides an individualized intervention approach.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rule-based systems are used to identify problem gambling behavior, then the system is simple to implement, but the detection accuracy and reliability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rule-based mechanical systems with machine learning algorithms that automatically learn patterns from gambling transaction data. The system uses supervised learning models trained on expert-labeled datasets to identify problem gambling behavior, substituting manual rule-definition with automated data-driven pattern recognition that achieves superior detection accuracy while maintaining implementation feasibility through standardized ML pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If self-assessment tests are used, then individuals can self-identify problems, but the results are biased by personal interpretation and conception

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-identification capabilityVSAvoidassessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary objective analysis system that processes gambling transaction data without relying on subjective self-reporting. The machine learning model acts as an impartial mediator between raw transaction data and problem gambling identification, eliminating personal bias while preserving the ability for individuals to be assessed based on their actual gambling patterns rather than their self-perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If monetary limits are set by gambling providers, then at-risk behavior can be limited, but other aspects of problem gambling are overlooked and the approach is too simplistic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior limitation capabilityVSAvoidcomprehensive problem detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments problem gambling detection into multiple independent risk indicators including betting amount, frequency, time of day, day of week, and game type. Rather than relying on a single monetary limit threshold, the system divides the assessment into distinct feature dimensions that are analyzed separately and combined through machine learning, enabling comprehensive detection of various problem gambling patterns beyond simple spending limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If manual expert assessment is used to define problem gambling, then accurate identification is possible, but the process is time-consuming and cannot be scaled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpert assessment accuracyVSAvoiddetection speed and scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on comprehensive expert-labeled datasets before deployment. During operation, the pre-trained model instantly applies learned patterns to new gambling data without requiring real-time expert intervention. This preliminary training phase captures expert knowledge in advance, enabling rapid scalable detection while preserving expert-level accuracy during actual problem gambling identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Ease of operation

If self-exclusion facilities are provided, then at-risk individuals can voluntarily exclude themselves, but many fail to use this opportunity or are not unsusceptible to prevention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-exclusion capabilityVSAvoidprevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback by monitoring gambling patterns in real-time and automatically identifying problem gambling behavior through machine learning. The system provides ongoing feedback about detected risky patterns and can trigger automated interventions or alerts to providers, replacing static self-exclusion mechanisms with dynamic adaptive monitoring that responds to changing behavior patterns and maintains prevention effectiveness without requiring continuous user action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11893854B2Detection of possible problem gambling behaviour
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 MINDWAY AI APS
  • US11893854B2 patent drawing
  • US11893854B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a system and a method for identifying possible problematic behaviour in gambling, in particular online gambling involving monetary transactions. One embodiment relates to a computer implemented method for detection of possible problem gaming behaviour of a subject engaged in one or more 5 games involving monetary transactions, the method comprising the steps of obtaining a dataset comprising the subjects gaining transactions over a time period, analysing the gaining behaviour of said subject by modelling against a trained model employing artificial intelligence, and predicting and/or detecting Possible Problem Gambling Behavior (PPGB) of said subject based on the analysis wherein the trained model is 10 trained based on one or more behavioral targets at outcome.