AI-Generated Security System Configuration for New Sites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing and configuring a security system for a new facility, particularly large sites with numerous access doors, involves determining a large number of configuration parameters, which is challenging and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing an AI model trained on configuration and usage data from existing sites to automatically generate configuration parameters and spatial models for a target site's security system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual configuration methods are used for security systems in large facilities, then configuration accuracy can be maintained, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses spatial models copied from existing sites as templates for new site configurations. The AI model learns from configuration data and spatial models of multiple existing sites, then generates configuration parameters for new sites by adapting these copied templates, significantly reducing manual configuration time while maintaining accuracy through proven designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The AI model automatically adjusts configuration parameters based on site-specific characteristics. It takes general configuration templates and modifies parameters such as access control settings, spatial relationships, and security levels to match the unique requirements of each target site, enabling rapid adaptation without manual reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If AI automation is used to generate configuration parameters, then configuration time is reduced, but the complexity of the configuration process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration efficiencyVSAvoidconfiguration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically generating configuration parameters without requiring manual intervention. The AI model autonomously processes spatial models, analyzes site characteristics, and produces configuration outputs, enabling the system to configure itself based on learned patterns from existing sites

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The AI model acts as an intermediary between spatial models and configuration parameters. It translates spatial relationships and site characteristics into appropriate configuration settings, bridging the gap between physical site data and system configuration requirements while handling the complexity internally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If configuration parameters are generated from existing sites, then consistency across sites is improved, but adaptability to unique site requirements may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration consistencyVSAvoidsite-specific adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The configuration generation process is dynamic rather than static. The AI model adapts its output based on the specific characteristics of each target site while maintaining consistency with proven configurations from existing sites. It dynamically adjusts configuration parameters to balance standardization benefits with site-specific requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If manual configuration is performed for each hardware component, then configuration accuracy is maintained, but the quantity of configuration work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidnumber of configuration parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The configuration process is segmented into hierarchical levels: spatial models define overall site structure, configuration templates provide standard settings for component categories, and specific parameters are automatically instantiated. This segmentation allows the system to handle large numbers of parameters systematically through pattern recognition rather than individual manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4607487A1Method and system for generating configuration parameters for a security system
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP4607487A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4607487A1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4607487A1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Configuration and usage data associated with a security system for each of a plurality of existing sites may be received, including a spatial model for the security system of the corresponding existing site and historical access data for the security system of the corresponding existing site. An Artificial Intelligence (AI) model is trained using the configuration and usage data associated with the security systems of the plurality of existing sites. Site information for a target site is received and is submitted to the AI model, wherein in response, the AI model automatically generates a spatial model for a security system of the target site and configuration parameters for the security system of the target site. The generated spatial model and the configuration parameters for the security system of the target site are subsequently used to setup and operate the security system at the target site.