AI-Governed Processor Workload Allocation for Pipeline Hazard Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processor architectures face inefficiencies due to structural and data hazards, leading to suboptimal performance and energy waste, with existing machine learning solutions failing to effectively leverage AI for predictive capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an AI-governed processing pipeline that monitors performance metrics, trains an AI governance engine to optimize workload allocation, and selectively activates resources based on predicted performance, thereby unifying control and predictive structures to enhance efficiency and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional control structures are used to manage pipeline hazards, then processor reliability is improved, but device complexity and area increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control structures (hazard detection logic, pipeline flush mechanisms) with an AI-based system that uses machine learning models to predict and prevent hazards before they occur. The AI governor analyzes workload patterns and predicts potential structural and data hazards, allowing the system to proactively reconfigure the pipeline or allocate resources differently, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing the complexity of control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If large amounts of on-chip memory are included to facilitate control structures, then processor reliability is improved, but device area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor reliabilityVSAvoidon-chip memory area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes the parameters of memory allocation based on AI predictions of workload characteristics. Instead of allocating large fixed amounts of on-chip memory for control structures, the system uses the AI governor to predict when memory will be needed and allocates only the necessary amount at each moment. This allows the system to maintain reliability by having memory available when needed while significantly reducing the average on-chip memory area required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If more area and energy are invested in control structures, then processor reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol structure energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptation into the control structure through the AI governor, which continuously learns from workload patterns and adjusts control decisions in real-time. The system transitions from static, over-provisioned control structures to dynamic, demand-driven control that adapts its complexity and energy consumption based on the actual workload characteristics, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If traditional predictive capabilities are used for workload management, then processor productivity is improved, but adaptability decreases due to human biases and average case optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor productivityVSAvoidworkload adaptation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-improving system where the AI governor continuously learns from actual workload performance and automatically adapts its predictions and decisions. Unlike traditional systems that rely on pre-programmed heuristics or human expertise, this system serves itself by learning from data, eliminating human biases and continuously improving its adaptability to new workload types while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250284612A1Artificial intelligence governed processor
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250284612A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284612A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284612A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes identifying tasks to be completed by an AI governed processing unit, monitoring performance metrics of the AI governed processing unit, training an AI governance engine to predict performance corresponding to the AI governed processing unit based on the monitored performance metrics and workload features corresponding to the identified tasks, determining whether a predicted performance metric according to the AI governance engine exceeds the monitored one or more performance metrics, and responsive to determining the predicted performance metric exceeds the monitored performance metrics, enabling the AI governance engine to optimize workload allocation relative to the identified tasks and the AI governed processing unit. A system includes an artificial intelligence (AI) governance engine, an AI governed processing pipeline configured to execute a set of tasks, and one or more performance monitors configured to monitor performance of the AI governed processing pipeline.