AI-Guided Medical Preference Processing for Targeted Patient Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems require significant time and effort for medical professionals to elicit patient preferences through dialogue due to the complexity and variety of patient concerns, hindering efficient shared decision-making in medical treatment discussions.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device and method that utilizes a processing circuit to acquire patient replies, estimate medical treatment preferences, and generate tailored responses, including narrowed responses and summary reports, to facilitate efficient questioning without medical professional involvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If medical professionals directly elicit patient preferences through dialogue, then the accuracy and completeness of preference information is improved, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference information accuracyVSAvoidtime and effort for dialogue
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

An AI assistant acts as an intermediary between medical professionals and patients during preference elicitation. The AI handles the time-consuming dialogue and analysis work, while medical professionals receive processed preference information. This mediator approach maintains preference accuracy while dramatically reducing the time and effort burden on medical professionals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables patients to self-reflect and articulate their preferences through structured AI-guided questions, reducing the need for intensive professional interviewing. The AI analyzes patient responses autonomously to extract preference information, allowing patients to participate actively in their own preference documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If the AI system analyzes all patient replies comprehensively, then the preference estimation accuracy is improved, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI system segments the complex task of preference analysis into distinct functional modules: reply acquisition, preference estimation, response determination, and output generation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the processing pipeline, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while preserving comprehensive analysis capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms unstructured patient replies into structured preference data by changing the parameter representation from free-text responses to categorized preference estimates with confidence levels. This parameter transformation simplifies subsequent processing while maintaining the essential information content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If the system generates detailed summary reports for all preferences, then the information completeness is improved, but the information overload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference information completenessVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing different levels of detail for different preferences based on their importance and certainty. High-confidence, high-importance preferences receive detailed analysis in summary reports, while lower-priority preferences receive condensed information. This differentiated approach maintains information completeness for critical preferences while reducing overall information load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates partial summary reports that focus on the most significant preferences rather than attempting to document every single preference in equal detail. This partial action approach provides sufficient information for clinical decision-making without creating overwhelming documentation burdens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250225162A1Information processing device, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 CANON KK
  • US20250225162A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225162A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225162A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device of an embodiment includes a processing circuit. The processing circuit acquires a reply from a user. The processing circuit estimate medical treatment information including a plurality of preferences of the user regarding medical treatment on the basis of the reply. The processing circuit determine a response to the reply on the basis of the medical treatment information. The processing circuit outputs the response via an output interface. Furthermore, the processing circuit determines, as the response, at least one of a narrowed response and an approval request to the user.