AI Camera Hazard Detection With Proximity Alerts in Facilities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Workplace accidents, particularly slips, trips, and falls, are common and difficult to detect in large facilities, leading to increased downtime, property damage, and legal implications, with existing safety checks often being inadequate due to human error and varying safety standards.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing AI to analyze camera feeds and track user positions within facilities to detect safety violations, generating proximity alerts for users when they are near hazards, thereby enhancing safety checks and reducing human error.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual safety checks are performed by human personnel, then safety violations can be detected, but human error and varying safety standards lead to detection inaccuracies and inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety violation detection accuracyVSAvoidconsistency of safety checks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection by human safety personnel with an automated computer vision system using machine learning models. The system captures images via cameras and processes them through trained ML models to detect safety violations, eliminating human error and ensuring consistent application of safety standards across all inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables safety violations to be detected and reported automatically without requiring human intervention in the detection process. The machine learning model self-evaluates captured images against safety standards, generates violation reports, and can even provide real-time feedback to workers, making the safety monitoring system self-sufficient and consistent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If safety checks are performed manually in large facilities, then safety violations can be identified, but the process is time-consuming and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring capabilityVSAvoidwork downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous safety monitoring by having cameras continuously capture images and the machine learning model continuously process them in real-time. This eliminates the need for periodic manual inspections and allows safety monitoring to occur without interrupting workflow, maintaining both safety reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

By replacing slow manual inspection processes with automated computer vision and machine learning processing, the system achieves rapid analysis of facility conditions without requiring workers to stop their tasks. The automated system processes images much faster than human personnel can conduct manual checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive safety monitoring is implemented across the entire facility, then all safety violations can be detected, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of safety detectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the facility into multiple zones or areas, each monitored by specific cameras and machine learning models trained for that particular area. This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage while managing complexity by processing smaller, localized regions independently rather than analyzing the entire facility as one complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is designed to detect multiple types of safety violations across different facility areas using a single unified system. The model can identify various hazards such as improper PPE, blocked exits, and unsafe conditions, providing comprehensive detection capability without requiring separate specialized systems for each violation type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11941964B2Safety violation detection
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11941964B2 patent drawing
  • US11941964B2 patent drawing
  • US11941964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer system, and a computer program product for safety violation detection is provided. The present invention may include receiving a camera feed of a facility. The present invention may also include analyzing the received camera feed using an AI model to detect a safety violation in the facility. The present invention may also include tracking a position of a user device in the facility associated with a user moving through the facility. The present invention may further include generating a proximity alert responsive to determining that the tracked position of the user device is within a predetermined proximity of the safety violation in the facility. The present invention may also include outputting the generated proximity alert to the user device for preventative action by the user.