AI-Assisted Image Cropping for Custom Print Die-Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing custom printing systems lack flexibility and precision in image cropping, require substantial manual effort, and lack real-time feedback and machine learning integration, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistent results.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that incorporates a GUI module for manual image cropping with real-time visual feedback and machine learning, allowing users to trace crop boundaries with a cursor and overlay shading, while generating die-line and image files for precise customization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual image cropping is used in custom printing systems, then users can customize product images, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage customization flexibilityVSAvoidimage preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-processes images by automatically detecting subjects, identifying optimal crop regions, and preparing multiple crop options before the user needs to finalize their selection. This preliminary action reduces the time users would otherwise spend manually analyzing and selecting crop regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables users to perform image cropping tasks more efficiently by providing automated tools that assist them in selecting and refining crop regions. Users can interact with the system to adjust parameters and review options, while the system handles the computationally intensive tasks of image analysis and crop generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If predefined cropping shapes and sizes are limited, then the system remains simple to operate, but user creative control and customization ability are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoidcustomization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, fixed cropping templates to a dynamic cropping interface where users can freely define crop boundaries by interacting with the image. The system adapts the crop region based on real-time user input, allowing unlimited shape and size customization while maintaining an intuitive interface through visual feedback and guided interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If machine learning and AI are integrated into image processing systems, then automation and efficiency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing speedVSAvoidsystem technical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of automated image analysis and processing that sits between the user's input and the final cropped output. This intermediary component handles the complex machine learning tasks of subject detection, region identification, and crop optimization, while presenting simplified interaction options to the user and reducing overall system complexity from the user's perspective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If real-time visual feedback is provided during image cropping, then user satisfaction and precision improve, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop boundary accuracyVSAvoidreal-time processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic visual feedback updates rather than continuous real-time processing. The system processes image data at key moments during user interaction (such as when crop boundaries are defined or adjusted) and provides feedback at these discrete intervals, maintaining precision while reducing computational overhead compared to continuous real-time feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250306811A1System and method of image apportionment for customized printing
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 FLOWER KENNETH
  • US20250306811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250306811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250306811A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for cropping digital images in the manufacturing of customized printed products is provided. The system includes a processor and memory, the memory including modules for receiving an image and an identified parameter, determining a die-line file and an image file, and creating a real-time preview with a superimposed image file on the die-line file. The system allows a user to establish a crop boundary through a graphical user interface (GUI) module, utilizing a movable endpoint within a geometric element. The system records a line segment along the path of the movable endpoint, and overlays shading on the image to designate an area to be cropped, producing an optimized die-line file and image file for printing. The system also utilizes artificial intelligence to enhance the accuracy of manually cropping an image for a personalized product design without requiring extensive technical knowledge or precise manual intervention.