AI Image State Verification for Semantic Workflow Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to accurately determine the desired state of a system using digital images, as computers face challenges in identifying semantically meaningful differences and providing actionable guidance for transitioning between states, even with AI and ML models requiring extensive training.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses agentic workflows leveraging AI and ML to process digital images, evaluate objects against a semantic description of the desired state, and provide feedback on necessary modifications to achieve the desired state, utilizing grounded computer vision models, vision-language models, and large language models with chain-of-thought reasoning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional SOP materials are produced and distributed, then workers can access procedural information, but the materials require extensive time and labor to produce and may contain errors that reduce reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSOP information deliveryVSAvoidSOP production time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual SOP creation and distribution mechanisms with an automated computer vision system that captures, processes, and delivers procedural information through images and AI analysis, eliminating the time-consuming manual documentation process while maintaining information accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing workers to capture images with their devices and receive automated analysis and guidance without requiring manual SOP creation or updates by specialists, making the information delivery process autonomous and efficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If AI and ML models are trained extensively to accurately evaluate system states from images, then measurement precision improves, but the complexity of the system increases due to extensive training requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSystem state evaluation accuracyVSAvoidAI model training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing reference images of the desired state during system setup, which are then used to train the AI model specifically for that system configuration, reducing the need for extensive general training while maintaining high accuracy for the specific application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by training the AI model with system-specific reference images that capture the particular characteristics, lighting conditions, and configurations of the target system, rather than using generic training data, thereby achieving high precision for the specific application with reduced training complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If computer vision systems compare images at pixel level to detect differences, then measurement precision improves, but the system cannot determine which differences are semantically meaningful

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveImage difference detectionVSAvoidSemantic meaning of differences
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of object detection and semantic analysis between pixel-level comparison and state evaluation. The system identifies objects, their properties, and relationships in the image, then uses this semantic understanding to determine which visual differences are meaningful for assessing system state, filtering out irrelevant pixel variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If guided workflows are implemented to assist workers, then productivity and quality improve, but the workflows require extensive setup and configuration time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTask completion efficiencyVSAvoidWorkflow setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service guided workflows by automatically generating task guidance and state verification requirements based on the captured reference images and AI analysis, eliminating the need for manual workflow configuration while providing context-specific instructions to workers during task execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12567270B1On-demand state verification using digital image processing and artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 SQUINT INC
  • US12567270B1 patent drawing
  • US12567270B1 patent drawing
  • US12567270B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to using AI tools such as large language models, grounded computer vision models, and visual-language models to verify that the state of a target is the desired state of the target. An image of the target and a semantic textual description of the desired state of the target may be used to determine whether the state of the target is the desired state.