AI-Assisted Item Verification System for Marketplace Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online marketplaces face integrity issues due to undetected counterfeit items, which can lead to a reduction in users and items sold, as human experts are not perfect in verifying authenticity and may cause significant delays in the verification process.

Innovation Solution

A computer platform that allows users to list items for sale and enables experts to review and verify authenticity, using a hierarchical review process, machine learning, and AI tools to classify items as potentially counterfeit, while maintaining databases of genuine and counterfeit items for expert reference, and efficiently matching experts with items based on their expertise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human experts review items to verify authenticity, then verification accuracy improves, but verification time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into multiple levels: an initial automated screening stage that filters obvious cases, followed by expert review only for items that require deeper analysis. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high accuracy while reducing the time experts spend on routine verifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An automated preliminary review system acts as an intermediary between item submission and expert verification. This intermediary performs initial filtering and preparation, presenting only relevant cases to experts, thereby reducing overall verification time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple experts review each item to improve accuracy, then verification reliability improves, but processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring all items to undergo multiple expert reviews, the system applies partial action by conducting multiple reviews only for items flagged as high-risk or controversial by the automated system. Most items receive a single expert review, maintaining reliability for critical cases while preserving overall processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If experts are matched specifically to item types based on expertise, then verification accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where expert review outcomes and item characteristics are continuously analyzed to refine the matching algorithm. This feedback loop improves matching accuracy over time without requiring manual reconfiguration, thereby managing system complexity while enhancing verification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230169520A1System and method for verifying consumer items
Publication Date: 2023.06.01 GRAILED INC
  • US20230169520A1 patent drawing
  • US20230169520A1 patent drawing
  • US20230169520A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer platform is provided that permits selling users to list items for sale and to allow a number of experts to review and verify authenticity of these items. In some embodiments, the system may be capable of queuing items to be listed within a management system, and experts are permitted to review particular items. Also, it is appreciated that certain experts have particular expertise to evaluate items of certain types, and therefore, in some implementations, the system is configured to more accurately match experts with particular items to be reviewed.