AI Search With Knowledge Graphs for Personalized Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engines lack the ability to track user preferences and provide personalized, unbiased search results, leading to repetitive and irrelevant content, especially in virtual and augmented reality environments, and fail to assist users in refining future queries based on past interactions.

Innovation Solution

An artificial intelligence optimized search system that utilizes templates, heat maps, and 3-D manipulation techniques to provide personalized and relevant search results, allowing users to customize and collaborate on search queries, and filter out irrelevant content, while integrating multiple data sources to avoid individual biases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current search engines provide search results without tracking user preferences, then search results are quickly generated, but the results become repetitive and irrelevant to user needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch results generation speedVSAvoidrelevance of search results
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that track user interactions with search results and use this information to refine future search queries. User preferences, browsing history, and result engagement data are collected and fed back into the search algorithm to improve result relevance over time, resolving the contradiction between fast result generation and relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user preferences and search patterns before generating search results. By pre-processing user data and establishing preference profiles in advance, the system can quickly generate highly relevant results without needing to track every interaction in real-time, thus maintaining both speed and relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If search engines do not track previous searches, then user privacy is maintained, but users cannot find important information from past queries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to find important informationVSAvoiduser privacy intrusion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system tracks only the necessary search metadata and preferences without storing comprehensive user behavior data. By collecting only essential information such as search queries, results viewed, and time spent on pages, the system enables effective search result personalization while minimizing privacy intrusion, applying partial action to achieve the goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If search engines use traditional search algorithms, then implementation is simple, but they cannot provide personalized results tailored to individual users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsearch system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal preference profile framework that can adapt to different users, search queries, and content types using the same underlying mechanism. The preference profile system serves multiple functions: tracking user behavior, generating personalized results, and updating models automatically, thus achieving high adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The search system performs self-service by automatically learning user preferences and updating its own search algorithms without requiring manual programming or complex configuration. The system self-adjusts to user needs through automated machine learning, reducing the complexity burden on developers while maintaining high personalization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Quantity of substance

If search engines display all search results, then complete information is provided, but users cannot efficiently sift through relevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of search resultsVSAvoiduser ability to find information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality levels to different search results based on their relevance to the user's preferences and query intent. Highly relevant results are prominently displayed with enhanced features, while less relevant results are dimmed or grouped together, allowing users to quickly focus on important information without seeing all results at equal prominence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses visual differentiation through color coding and highlighting to indicate result relevance and importance. Relevant results are highlighted with specific colors or visual markers, while less relevant results have different visual characteristics, enabling users to quickly scan and identify important information without processing the entire result list.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentUS12373501B2Optimized artificial intelligence search system and method for providing content in response to search queries
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 GUSTAVSON MARK
  • US12373501B2 patent drawing
  • US12373501B2 patent drawing
  • US12373501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optimized artificial intelligence search system may comprise a tab icon or folder manipulation that are populated by knowledge graphs in a mixed or augmented reality environment. Systems of presentation may include a category first level derived by pre processing, a specific type second level derived by semantic vector space modelling and a third specific item information level derived by clustering and weighted model ontology. The presentation of information may also be presented in a left or right screen preference to comport with right and left brain function. Information displays may include timeline analysis. Data and tabular data structures may interact with dynamic knowledge graph super structures. Stop word lists may be used to remove uninformative terms or related queries. Subcategories of information or display my deployed by use of real time vector space modeling. Tab icons may be displayed upon user eyewear.