AI Learning Engine for Dynamic Financial Goal Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional goal management systems fail to dynamically adjust to users' evolving life stages and priorities, often neglecting to learn from changing user preferences and financial needs over time.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic user interface utilizing artificial intelligence for seamless data entry and goal planning, which learns from user profiles, income potential, life needs, and market performances, incorporating anomaly detection, association rule learning, and clustering to provide tailored financial recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional goal management systems are used, then the system structure is simple and easy to operate, but the system cannot dynamically adjust to users' evolving life stages and priorities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adjustment to life stagesVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability by continuously monitoring user inputs, selections, and behavioral patterns to automatically adjust goal management recommendations. The system evolves its recommendations based on changing user priorities and life stages, transforming a static system into a dynamic one that adapts over time without requiring manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by analyzing user responses, selections, and interactions with goal options. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from user behavior and refine its recommendations, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously improves its adaptability to individual user needs and changing circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional goal management systems are used, then the system is easy to operate, but it does not learn from user preferences or account for changes over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning from user preferencesVSAvoiduser interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service learning by automatically analyzing user preferences, selections, and behavioral patterns without requiring explicit user programming or configuration. The system autonomously learns from user interactions and automatically adjusts its goal management recommendations, eliminating the need for users to manually teach or reconfigure the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes its operational parameters based on learned user preferences and changing life stages. By adjusting recommendation parameters, goal priorities, and presentation styles based on accumulated learning, the system adapts its behavior to match user needs while maintaining ease of operation through automatic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If AI models are used to analyze user data and provide personalized recommendations, then the system becomes more adaptable to individual needs, but the computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized recommendationsVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the user base into distinct clusters based on shared characteristics, goals, and behaviors. This clustering approach allows the system to provide personalized recommendations through group-based patterns rather than requiring complex individualized analysis for each user, reducing computational complexity while maintaining personalization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by focusing computational resources on analyzing the most relevant user attributes and goal parameters rather than processing all possible data points. By concentrating analysis on key discriminating factors that most influence recommendation quality, the system achieves effective personalization with reduced computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11804143B1Learning engine application
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
  • US11804143B1 patent drawing
  • US11804143B1 patent drawing
  • US11804143B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems and methods of artificial intelligence learning systems. In some embodiments the artificial intelligence system presents options to users based on their life stage and personality profile. Family or group structures may be created within an application. Options may be created and presented based on the family structure such as chores may be assigned to children, money may be transferred between family members, and scores may be assigned to different users.