AI Neural Network for Medical Indication Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare providers face inefficiencies when selecting medical indications for orders due to the need to review extensive lists generated by clinical decision support mechanisms, which often do not consider all relevant patient information and require manual selection from numerous options.

Innovation Solution

An AI-assisted medical indication selection system using a multi-layer neural network and content similarity engine processes patient, provider, and order information to automatically generate and prioritize medical indications based on evidence-based guidelines, reducing the need for manual selection by providing a focused list of probable indications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a qualified decision support mechanism generates a list of proposed indications based on patient age and gender, then regulatory compliance is achieved, but the list is lengthy and requires manual search through many options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidtime to search through indications
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the indication selection process into two stages: first, a qualified decision support mechanism generates a comprehensive list of proposed indications for regulatory compliance; second, an AI engine processes this list along with additional patient information to identify and rank the most relevant indications. This segmentation allows both compliance and efficiency to be achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The AI engine acts as an intermediary between the decision support mechanism's comprehensive indication list and the provider's need for a focused recommendation. It processes the lengthy list through neural network analysis, filtering and ranking indications based on multiple patient factors to present a condensed, prioritized set of options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If traditional decision support mechanisms use only patient age and gender, then the process is simple, but additional patient information is not considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of decision support mechanismVSAvoidpatient information not considered
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The AI engine is designed to process multiple types of patient information simultaneously - demographic data, clinical history, order details, and free-text reasons. This multi-functional capability allows the system to comprehensively evaluate all relevant factors without complicating the user interface or workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of all patient information through the neural network before presenting indications to the provider. By pre-analyzing patient demographics, clinical history, order specifics, and free-text inputs, the AI engine prepares a ranked list of indications in advance, saving the provider time during the actual ordering process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If providers manually select from thousands of medical indications, then comprehensive selection is possible, but productivity and efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive indication selectionVSAvoidorder entry efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of presenting all thousands of possible indications, the system performs a partial action by identifying and ranking only the most relevant indications based on AI analysis. This excessive filtering ensures that the top recommendations are highly probable matches, allowing providers to make efficient selections without reviewing the entire indication database.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the AI engine continuously learns from provider selections and outcomes. By analyzing which indications are chosen and their success rates, the neural network refines its recommendations over time, improving both the comprehensiveness and efficiency of indication selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12148513B2Medical indication determination using neural network prediction engine
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 CHANGE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12148513B2 patent drawing
  • US12148513B2 patent drawing
  • US12148513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving first information associated with a patient, second information associated with a provider, and third information associated with an order, and determining, using a multi-layer neural network, a medical indication corresponding to the order responsive to receiving the first information, the second information, and the third information.