AI Message Summarization and Priority Routing for Inbox Overload

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic messaging systems are time-intensive and resource-consuming due to users reading and interacting with numerous messages to determine relevance, leading to reduced productivity and excessive computing resource usage.

Innovation Solution

An electronic messaging system uses a generative AI model to categorize and prioritize incoming activity items, generating digest, importance, and content summaries, allowing users to navigate through summarized information based on priority, reducing the need for individual message retrieval and interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users read and interact with numerous messages individually to determine relevance, then message review completeness is improved, but productivity deteriorates and computing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage review completenessVSAvoiduser productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating summaries of messages and activity items before users review them. The generative AI model creates digest summaries, importance summaries, and content summaries in advance, allowing users to quickly assess relevance without reading entire messages, thus maintaining review completeness while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism - the AI-generated summary - that mediates between the full message content and user review. These summaries act as intermediaries that preserve the essential information needed for relevance determination while reducing the time and cognitive resources required for review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If users read and interact with numerous messages individually, then message review completeness is improved, but computing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage review completenessVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the essential information from full messages by generating condensed summaries using AI models. Instead of processing and displaying complete messages, the system takes out only the critical content elements needed for relevance assessment, reducing computing resource consumption while maintaining review effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of message representation from full-text format to summarized format with priority ratings. This parameter transformation reduces the computational burden of message processing while preserving the information necessary for complete review, as summaries capture key points and priority indicators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If the system provides all new messages to users without prioritization, then information completeness is improved, but information overload increases and usability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidusability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the information presentation by dividing messages into categorized summaries with different priority levels (digest summaries, importance summaries, content summaries). This segmentation organizes information completeness into manageable segments that users can review systematically, reducing overload while maintaining completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of summary detail and priority emphasis for different messages based on their importance. High-priority messages receive more prominent presentation with importance summaries, while lower-priority messages are presented with standard digest summaries, making the interface more usable by adapting information presentation to local needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of information

If the system generates comprehensive summaries for all messages, then information quality is improved, but processing time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by generating different types of summaries selectively rather than comprehensive summaries for all messages. The AI model generates digest summaries for all new activity items, importance summaries for high-priority items, and content summaries as needed, providing information quality where most needed while reducing processing time for lower-priority content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250365258A1Electronic message system with artificial intelligence (AI)-generated personalized summarization
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20250365258A1 patent drawing
  • US20250365258A1 patent drawing
  • US20250365258A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic message computing system tracks new activity items that reflect activities that have not yet been seen by the user. A. generative artificial intelligence (AI) model generates a digest summary that is provided to the user the next time the user accesses the electronic message system. The digest summary summarizes new activity. The generative AI model also generates importance summaries that summarize the importance of a particular activity to the user, and content summaries that summarize the content of an activity item (such as an electronic mail message). The electronic messaging system also assigns a priority to each new activity item and provides the summaries, along with a priority, to a client computing system. The client computing system conducts a user experience, navigating the user through the new activity items, based upon the priority assigned by the electronic message computing system.