AI Metadata Enrichment for Privacy-Safe Structured Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI models lack the ability to automatically generate semantic metadata for structured data structures like tables without accessing the actual data, which compromises privacy and security, and hinders downstream operations such as natural language processing and computer vision due to insufficient metadata like column descriptions and tags.

Innovation Solution

A fine-tuned AI model is trained using a curated dataset to generate semantic metadata for structured data structures based solely on their structure, leveraging multi-task learning with balanced batches to avoid training forgetfulness, and deploying it to enhance metadata without accessing the data content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If AI models are trained to generate semantic metadata for structured data structures, then metadata quality and downstream operation effectiveness are improved, but training complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata qualityVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The training process is segmented into multiple independent tasks (column description generation, tag generation, data type inference) that can be trained separately and then combined. This divides the complex training problem into manageable segments, reducing overall training complexity while maintaining metadata quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing structured data into standardized formats and pre-defining task templates before actual training begins. This preparation work simplifies the subsequent training process and reduces computational complexity during the main training phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If AI models access actual data content to generate metadata, then metadata accuracy improves, but privacy and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata accuracyVSAvoidprivacy risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential structural information (column names, data types, relationships) from structured data while deliberately excluding actual data content. This extraction approach generates accurate metadata based on structure alone, preventing privacy compromise while maintaining sufficient metadata quality for downstream operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that processes structured data through predefined schemas and constraints, generating metadata without direct access to sensitive data content. This intermediary mechanism acts as a buffer that preserves privacy while still enabling accurate metadata generation based on structural patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multi-task learning is used to train AI models for multiple metadata enhancement tasks, then task versatility improves, but training stability deteriorates due to training forgetfulness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask versatilityVSAvoidtraining stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by balancing the training batches before multi-task learning begins. Each task is pre-sampled to ensure equal representation, and training data is curated to maintain consistent quality across all tasks. This preliminary balancing prevents training forgetfulness and maintains stability throughout multi-task training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor performance across all tasks during training and dynamically adjust batch compositions to maintain balance. When the model shows signs of forgetting certain tasks, the feedback loop increases the weight of those tasks in subsequent batches, maintaining training stability while preserving task versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12547837B2Artificial intelligence based metadata semantic enrichment
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12547837B2 patent drawing
  • US12547837B2 patent drawing
  • US12547837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Mechanisms are provided for automatically generating semantical enhanced metadata for a structured data structure. Multi-task machine learning training is performed, based on data comprising separate sets of training data samples for each of a plurality of semantic metadata enhancement tasks, of a base artificial intelligence (AI) computer model to thereby generate a fine-tuned AI computer model trained to specifically generate semantically enhanced metadata for structured data structures. A prompt is received that specifies a structure of an input structured data structure and requests a semantic metadata enhancement task from the plurality of semantic metadata enhancement tasks. The fine-tuned AI computer model processes the prompt to generate semantically enhanced metadata for the structure of the input structured data structure and provide it to a downstream computing system for performing a downstream computing operation based on the semantically enhanced metadata.