AI/ML Model Parameter Importance for Cross-Domain Knowledge Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI/ML models struggle to maintain performance across varying domains in wireless communications systems, leading to loss of knowledge when adapted for a new domain, rendering them ineffective in previous domains.

Innovation Solution

A method to adapt AI/ML models by identifying knowledge-intensive parameters and minimizing changes to these parameters during updates, while allowing adaptation to new domains, thus preserving knowledge from previous domains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If AI/ML models are adapted for a new domain, then the model can perform in the new domain, but knowledge from previous domains is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to new domainVSAvoidloss of knowledge from previous domains
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies knowledge-intensive parameters from the AI/ML model using gradient-based importance estimation. By separating these critical parameters from the full parameter set, the system can selectively update only non-critical parameters during domain adaptation, thereby preserving knowledge from previous domains while adapting to new domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different update strategies to different parameters based on their importance. Knowledge-intensive parameters (identified through gradient analysis) are protected from updates or updated with stronger regularization, while non-knowledge-intensive parameters are freely updated. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by allowing adaptation where needed while preserving knowledge where critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If all model parameters are updated during adaptation, then the model adapts fully to the new domain, but performance in previous domains deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance in new domainVSAvoidperformance in previous domains
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the update behavior of model parameters based on their identified importance. By computing gradient-based importance metrics and using them to modulate parameter updates (through masking, regularization, or selective freezing), the system achieves partial parameter updates that balance adaptation to new domains with preservation of performance in previous domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If knowledge-intensive parameters are identified and protected, then knowledge is preserved across domains, but the complexity of the adaptation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreservation of knowledgeVSAvoidcomplexity of adaptation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-assessment of parameter importance through gradient-based analysis during the adaptation process. By automatically identifying knowledge-intensive parameters through their gradient magnitudes and using this information to guide protection strategies, the system reduces the need for manual intervention or complex external assessment mechanisms, thereby managing complexity while preserving knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250254540A1Indicating model parameters for continual learning of communications network models
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 LENOVO UNITED STATES INC
  • US20250254540A1 patent drawing
  • US20250254540A1 patent drawing
  • US20250254540A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure relate to adapting (or updating) an artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) model (e.g., a deep neural network) to unknown/new target domains while minimizing any loss of knowledge of previous domains within which the model was deployed or adapted. For example, an adaptation procedure may determine or identify knowledge intensive (e.g., important) parameters of the model and adapt the model to a new domain while minimizing changes to values of the knowledge intensive parameters. The procedure may determine a metric for each parameter of the model (e.g., a knowledge coefficient or importance metric) and minimize changes to values of any parameters having relatively high importance metrics during adaptation/updating of the model.