Generative AI Model Analytics System Using Scoring Agents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information handling systems lack efficient methods for performing generative artificial intelligence model analytics, particularly in analyzing and providing actionable insights on large language models, which hinders users' ability to optimize and secure their AI operations.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a generative artificial intelligence model analytics system that includes scoring agents to analyze AI models, generate reports, and provide user-friendly interfaces for users to monitor, manage, and optimize AI operations, incorporating remediation, recommendation, summary, benchmarking, and indexing operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If generative AI model analytics operations are performed on large language models, then actionable insights and performance optimization are achieved, but the complexity of the system increases due to the need for multiple scoring agents and comprehensive analysis mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI model performance optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the AI model analytics operation into multiple independent scoring agents, each responsible for specific evaluation tasks. This segmentation allows complex analysis to be broken down into manageable components that can be executed separately and aggregated into comprehensive results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The generative AI model analytics system is designed to perform multiple functions including security assessment, performance evaluation, bias detection, and optimization recommendations. This multi-functionality consolidates various analytics operations into a single unified system, managing complexity through versatility rather than separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive analysis of AI models is performed using multiple scoring agents, then the precision of analysis results is improved, but the time required to complete the analytics operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis precisionVSAvoidanalytics operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessments using scoring agents that evaluate different aspects of the AI model in parallel. By conducting preliminary analysis on multiple dimensions simultaneously, the system achieves comprehensive precision without sequentially processing each assessment, thereby reducing total operation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The analytics system maintains continuous operation by processing multiple scoring agent results concurrently and aggregating them in real-time. This continuous action ensures that the system achieves high measurement precision through comprehensive data collection while minimizing idle time between analysis stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of information

If the system provides comprehensive reports with actionable insights and recommendations, then the value and usefulness of the analytics operation is improved, but the quantity of information processed and communicated increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation valueVSAvoidinformation quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most critical and actionable insights from the comprehensive analysis results, separating essential information from redundant data. By taking out only the most valuable findings and recommendations, the system maintains high information value while reducing the overall quantity of communicated information to what is truly necessary for decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The reporting mechanism provides different levels of detail tailored to specific user needs and contexts. Critical security issues receive detailed analysis while routine performance metrics receive summarized reporting. This local quality approach ensures that information value is optimized for each specific context without uniformly increasing information quantity across all outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240428081A1Generative Artificial Intelligence Model Analytics System
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 TRUSTWISE INC
  • US20240428081A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428081A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428081A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect of an embodiment, a method for performing a generative artificial intelligence model analytics operation may include obtaining an artificial intelligence (AI) model. The method may further include performing analysis of the AI model using one or more scoring agents. The method may further include generating a report including results of the analysis and providing the report on a user interface.