Federated AI Model Chain Routing for Computational Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional software services that utilize machine learning functionality are unable to efficiently correlate user requests with appropriate machine learning model complexities, leading to compromised output quality or unnecessary resource consumption.

Innovation Solution

A federated AI system that uses a model chain to process requests, where a scoring machine learning model determines the lowest computational complexity model that meets a performance threshold, allowing lower complexity requests to be handled by lower complexity models and reserving resources for higher complexity requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single high-complexity machine learning model is used to handle all user requests, then output quality is maintained, but computational resource consumption increases unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput qualityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the machine learning model set into multiple complexity levels (first, second, third models with increasing computational complexity). A scoring model evaluates each request and routes it to the appropriate complexity level, ensuring high-complexity models are only used when necessary while maintaining output quality through selective model deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If a single low-complexity machine learning model is used to reduce resource consumption, then computational efficiency improves, but output quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidoutput quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic model selection mechanism where the scoring model evaluates each user request and dynamically selects the appropriate machine learning model complexity level. This allows the system to adaptively use low-complexity models for simple requests (improving efficiency) while switching to high-complexity models when request characteristics indicate higher quality requirements (maintaining reliability).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If multiple machine learning models of varying complexity are deployed, then resource efficiency improves through selective model usage, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a scoring model as an intermediary component that manages the complexity of selecting among multiple machine learning models. The scoring model evaluates user requests and determines the appropriate model complexity level, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing the decision-making process rather than requiring complex routing logic throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If high-complexity machine learning models are used for all requests, then output quality is ensured, but processing speed decreases due to unnecessary computational overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput qualityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by matching model complexity to request characteristics. The scoring model analyzes each user request and assigns it to a machine learning model with appropriate complexity level - using low-complexity models for simple requests (faster processing) and high-complexity models only when request features indicate quality requirements (ensuring output quality). This localized optimization improves overall processing speed while maintaining quality where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250165803A1Federated Artificial Intelligence System For Request Processing Using A Model Chain
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US20250165803A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165803A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165803A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A federated artificial intelligence system executes machine learning models of a model chain in order of increasing computational complexity to determine a lowest computational complexity model to use to serve a quality response to a user request. A first machine learning model of the model chain performs an inference operation to produce first output based on the user request. A scoring machine learning model determines that the first output fails to meet a threshold. Based on such determination, a second machine learning model of the model chain performs a second inference operation to produce second output based on the user request, in which the second machine learning model has a higher computational complexity than the first machine learning model. The scoring machine learning model determines that the second output meets the threshold, and, based on such determination, the second output is transmitted in response to the user request.