AI Model Evaluation Template Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing techniques for managing AI model evaluations are inefficient due to high costs associated with manual template generation and management, as well as the need to associate evaluation results with changing viewpoints and methods.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that generates and manages association data between model data, risk assessment data, and evaluation method data within a template, allowing for automatic template creation and report generation based on these associations, reducing the need for manual management and updating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If templates are generated manually according to changing evaluation viewpoints and methods, then the evaluation can adapt to changes, but the template generation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing evaluation viewpointsVSAvoidtemplate generation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic template generation by having the computer system automatically create templates based on stored evaluation viewpoints and methods, eliminating the need for manual template creation and reducing generation costs while maintaining adaptability to changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Evaluation viewpoints and methods are registered and stored in advance in the computer system, allowing templates to be automatically generated when needed without manual intervention, thus reducing generation cost while preserving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If templates and evaluation results are managed in association, then evaluation integrity is maintained, but management cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation result management integrityVSAvoidmanagement cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges template management and evaluation result management into a single integrated process, where templates and results are automatically associated through the computer system, maintaining integrity while reducing separate management costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The computer system automatically associates evaluation results with corresponding templates without manual intervention, maintaining evaluation integrity while eliminating the need for separate manual association management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If evaluation viewpoints and methods change frequently, then the evaluation remains relevant, but the frequency of template updates increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of evaluationVSAvoidtime for template updates
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Evaluation viewpoints and methods are registered in advance in the computer system, so when changes occur, new templates can be automatically generated immediately without time-consuming manual updates, maintaining relevance while reducing update time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The computer system automatically generates updated templates when evaluation viewpoints or methods change, eliminating manual template update work and reducing the time required to maintain evaluation relevance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240169220A1Computer system and model evaluation method
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 HITACHI LTD
  • US20240169220A1 patent drawing
  • US20240169220A1 patent drawing
  • US20240169220A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system is accessibly connected to model management information for managing model data, risk assessment management information for managing risk assessment data, and evaluation method management information for managing evaluation method data, and generates, as relation data, association of, model data, risk assessment data, and evaluation method data in a template. The computer system is configured to, when receiving an evaluation request, by referring to the model management information, search for model data of a model to be evaluated, search for the relation data associated with the model data, generate a template based on the relation data, store, in association with the relation data, an evaluation result based on an evaluation method corresponding to the evaluation method data associated with the relation data, and generate a report based on the template and the evaluation result.