AI Model Management Between Wireless Radio Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication networks lack effective management of Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) models across radio nodes, leading to inefficient model selection, performance supervision, and retraining needs.

Innovation Solution

Introducing communication between radio nodes to manage AI/ML models implemented at User Equipment (UE) and network nodes, enabling optimized model selection, performance monitoring, and tailored model usage based on conditions such as signal quality and node energy state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If AI/ML models are deployed at radio nodes without inter-node communication for model management, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but model performance supervision and retraining coordination deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel management operationVSAvoidmodel performance supervision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where radio nodes exchange model performance information and status updates with neighboring nodes. This allows the network to monitor model performance across distributed nodes and trigger retraining when performance degradation is detected, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and performance supervision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary model management function that coordinates between distributed radio nodes. This intermediary layer handles model distribution, performance collection, and retraining coordination, enabling reliable model supervision without requiring complex direct peer-to-peer management between all nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If AI/ML models are managed independently at each radio node, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to network conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel deploymentVSAvoidmodel selection adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic model selection where radio nodes can adaptively choose from multiple model versions based on current network conditions, performance metrics, and node-specific characteristics. This dynamic approach allows the system to be manufactured with a set of models but adaptively select the most appropriate model at runtime, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the model management function into independent components that can be distributed across radio nodes. Each node maintains local model information and can independently select appropriate models, while still benefiting from network-wide model coordination. This segmentation enables simple manufacturing of individual nodes while achieving collective adaptability through their interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If comprehensive model management communication is implemented between radio nodes, then model performance supervision and retraining coordination are improved, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performance supervisionVSAvoidcommunication energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic model performance reporting and status exchange between radio nodes, rather than continuous communication. Nodes report model performance metrics and status at predetermined intervals or when significant changes occur, enabling reliable model supervision while minimizing communication energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If frequent model updates and retraining are coordinated between radio nodes, then model performance and reliability are improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidmodel retraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary model training and preparation at centralized locations or during low-traffic periods, so that trained models are ready for deployment before needed. This preliminary action allows the system to maintain high model performance and reliability through regular updates while minimizing the time loss during actual model deployment, as the models are pre-trained and ready for quick distribution to radio nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250203401A1Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Model Management Between Wireless Radio Nodes
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20250203401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250203401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250203401A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (1100) by a radio node (110, 210, 310) includes transmitting (1102), to another radio node (120, 220, 320), information indicating an activation or a deactivation of one or more AI and/or ML models at the radio node. For example, the radio node may include a UE and the other radio node may include a base station such that the base station is able to inform and/or suggest modifications in the node configurations to enhance communication performance and model selection at the UE.