AI Model Status Detection Using Question-Answering Subsystem Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern AI-based computer systems face challenges in ensuring model robustness and accuracy, particularly due to the complexity of AI models and their dependencies across subsystems, which can lead to operational integrity issues and require better architecting practices.

Innovation Solution

A method is provided to automatically enhance model robustness and accuracy by identifying model information, related subsystems, and important subsystems using a trained question-answering model. This involves calculating scores for subsystems and revising model results based on these subsystems, while generating a system status interpretability report.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If AI models are deployed throughout different subsystems with dependencies, then the system can generate actionable insights and improve functionality, but model robustness and accuracy deteriorate due to complexity and operational integrity issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidmodel robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where a question-answering model continuously evaluates the status of AI models and their subsystems, calculates importance scores, and generates interpretability reports. This feedback loop enables automatic identification of critical subsystems and revision of model results based on operational status, thereby maintaining model robustness while preserving system functionality across multiple dependent subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If multiple AI models are deployed across subsystems, then data quality and insights improve, but operational integrity challenges increase requiring better architecting practices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidoperational integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a question-answering model as an intermediary that mediates between multiple AI models and their subsystems. This intermediary automatically identifies model information, evaluates subsystem relationships, calculates importance scores, and generates interpretability reports. By centralizing the evaluation and coordination function, the system maintains data quality across multiple models while reducing operational integrity challenges through automated management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If AI-based systems use AI to improve architecting practices, then model accuracy enhances, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by deploying an AI-based question-answering model that autonomously evaluates AI model status, identifies critical subsystems, and generates interpretability reports without external intervention. The system automatically calculates importance scores using trained models and revises model results based on subsystem status. This self-service approach enhances model accuracy through continuous evaluation while managing system architecture complexity through automation rather than manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250173605A1Computer system status detection and management including artificial intelligence (AI) model improvement using trustworthy ai
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250173605A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173605A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173605A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method automatically enhancing model robustness and accuracy associated with a specified artificial intelligence (AI) model. The method may include automatically identifying model information associated with each of the AI models in the AI-based computer system, wherein automatically identifying the model information further comprises identifying a status of model results for the AI models. The method may also include automatically identifying the one or more subsystems related to the specified AI model. The method may further include, based on the identification of the related one or more subsystems, automatically identifying one or more important subsystems to the specified AI model. The method may also include, based on the one or more important subsystems, automatically revising the status of a model result of the specified AI model according to model revision rules. The method may also include generate a system status interpretability report for the specified AI model.