AI Model Penetration Testing Plugin for Real-Time Trust Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large organizations face challenges in efficiently, securely, and uniformly managing information exchange between internal and external computer systems, particularly in ensuring the security of AI model-based applications, which are vulnerable to vulnerabilities introduced during training or high usage scenarios, leading to potential data security issues and faulty decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A real-time artificial intelligence model vulnerability testing system that includes a scanning plugin on user devices to interact with AI applications, perform penetration testing, and generate trust scores, with the ability to disable execution or trigger alerts for vulnerabilities, and integrate with a centralized MLOps system for automated responses and vulnerability resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time penetration testing is performed on AI models, then security vulnerability detection capability is improved, but system complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerability detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the penetration testing process into distinct modular components: a scanning plugin module that interfaces with AI applications, a penetration testing engine module that executes security tests, and a result analysis module that processes vulnerability data. This modular architecture reduces system complexity by allowing each component to be developed, maintained, and scaled independently while maintaining comprehensive security testing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary penetration testing actions by pre-configuring test scenarios, attack vectors, and vulnerability patterns before actual AI model execution. The scanning plugin continuously monitors and prepares test cases in advance, allowing the penetration testing engine to execute predefined security tests without real-time computational overhead during critical AI operations, thus balancing security detection with system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If continuous security scanning is performed on AI applications, then detection precision is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic security scanning at strategically determined intervals rather than continuous monitoring. The scanning plugin monitors AI application states and triggers penetration tests based on event-driven conditions such as model updates, configuration changes, or scheduled time intervals. This periodic action maintains high vulnerability detection precision while significantly reducing computational overhead and processing time compared to continuous scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts scanning parameters such as test depth, attack vector complexity, and monitoring frequency based on AI application risk profiles, historical vulnerability data, and current system load conditions. High-risk applications receive more intensive scanning with higher precision, while low-risk applications undergo lighter periodic checks, optimizing the balance between detection precision and processing time across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated penetration testing is implemented, then productivity is improved, but the ability to detect novel vulnerabilities may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity testing efficiencyVSAvoidvulnerability detection adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where penetration test results, vulnerability patterns, and security incidents are continuously analyzed and fed back into the test scenario database. The scanning plugin learns from detected vulnerabilities and automatically generates new test cases based on emerging threat patterns. This feedback loop enables automated testing to adapt to novel vulnerabilities while maintaining high productivity, as the system evolves its testing capabilities based on real-world security data rather than relying solely on pre-programmed test scripts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260064849A1Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Model Vulnerability Testing System
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20260064849A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064849A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064849A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the disclosure relate to automated real-time penetration testing of artificial intelligence (AI) models used by AI-based applications. A real-time AI model penetration testing plugin orchestrates real-time penetration testing for scanning and detecting vulnerabilities in AI model-based applications, particularly those applications leveraging generative AI algorithms. A plugin installation on a user device automatically scans AI model-based application operations hosted locally to the user device and/or centrally located on a remote server and provides a degree of confidence and trust corresponding to use of the AI model-based application. The plugin orchestrates security scans before all transactions and/or tasks executed by the AI application and initiates a security response based on a trust score corresponding to penetration test results.