AI Model Verification System Using Automated Question Interrogation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining the accuracy of artificial intelligence models is challenging due to the difficulty in differentiating between truthful and false or misleading information generated by these models.

Innovation Solution

A verification determination system that receives user prompts and verification questions, interrogates an artificial intelligence model, analyzes its answers, and generates a verification score, thereby ensuring the model's accuracy and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional verification methods are used for AI models, then manual review and analysis can be performed, but the process is time-consuming and requires significant human resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual verification processes with an automated computerized system that uses algorithms to generate verification questions, evaluate AI model responses, and determine verification scores. This substitution of mechanical human review with automated computational processes directly resolves the contradiction by maintaining verification accuracy while dramatically reducing verification time and human resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The verification system performs self-service by automatically generating verification questions, evaluating its own assessment of AI model responses, and computing verification scores without requiring external human intervention. The system uses pre-established criteria and answer keys to autonomously complete the verification process, eliminating the need for manual time investment while preserving verification rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive verification questions are asked to ensure accuracy, then more verification questions need to be generated and analyzed, but this increases computational resources and system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracy verificationVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system segments the verification process into distinct modular components: question generation, response evaluation, and score determination. Each component operates independently with clearly defined inputs and outputs, allowing the system to handle comprehensive verification questions through organized, manageable segments rather than a monolithic complex process. This modular architecture reduces system complexity while enabling thorough verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by changing parameters such as the number of verification questions, question difficulty levels, and evaluation criteria based on the specific AI model being verified. This flexibility allows the system to adjust the verification depth and computational requirements dynamically, maintaining high reliability while adapting system complexity to match the verification needs of different models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple verification questions are asked to thoroughly check the AI model, then more computational resources are consumed for processing and analyzing answers, but this increases energy usage and processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification thoroughnessVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system applies partial action by determining the appropriate number and depth of verification questions based on the specific requirements of each AI model and the verification goals. Rather than always using the maximum number of questions, the system uses just enough verification questions to achieve the required verification thoroughness, thereby reducing unnecessary computational resource consumption and energy usage while maintaining adequate verification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250068937A1System and method for determining verification characteristics of an advanced computational model for data analysis and automated decision-making
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20250068937A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068937A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068937A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, computer program products, and methods are described herein for determining verification characteristics of an advanced computational model for data analysis and automated decision-making. The present disclosure is configured to receive, from a user device, a user prompt, wherein the user device is associated with a user. Further, the present disclosure is configured to receive one or more verification questions. Further still, the present disclosure is configured to interrogate, in response to receiving the one or more verification questions, an artificial intelligence model. Further still, the present disclosure is configured to receive, in response to interrogating the artificial intelligence model, one or more verification answers. Further still, the present disclosure is configured to analyze the one or more verification answers. Further still, the present disclosure is configured to generate a verification interface component, wherein the verification interface component comprises data associated with the one or more verification answers.