AI Movement Scoring for Objective UPDRS Symptom Quantification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for quantifying movement disorder symptoms, such as Parkinson's disease, suffer from subjective clinician evaluations leading to inconsistent and unreliable UPDRS scores, lacking objective and time-efficient solutions capable of correlating with standardized scales like the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).

Innovation Solution

A system using miniaturized sensors to measure kinematic features, processed by algorithms trained on clinician-provided reference data, to generate scores that objectively correlate with UPDRS, enabling rapid and accurate symptom quantification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If clinician visual observation and subjective scoring is used for UPDRS evaluation, then treatment decisions can be made based on symptom assessment, but the scores vary considerably between different evaluators and between the same evaluator's assessments at different times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescore reliabilityVSAvoidevaluator consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/visual observation system with an automated sensor-based measurement system. Sensors objectively capture movement parameters (acceleration, velocity, position) and algorithms process these data to generate UPDRS scores, eliminating human visual assessment and its inherent subjectivity and variability between evaluators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated scoring system that acts as a mediator between patient movement and clinician assessment. This intermediary system processes sensor data through trained algorithms to produce standardized scores, removing the direct human evaluation step that causes variability while preserving the clinical decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If periodic office visit evaluations are conducted to monitor movement disorder symptoms, then treatment efficacy can be assessed, but the frequency and timing of assessments are limited by scheduling constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment frequencyVSAvoidtime between assessments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous monitoring of movement disorder symptoms through wearable sensors that collect data throughout the patient's daily life, rather than relying on discrete periodic office visits. This continuous data collection provides ongoing assessment of symptom severity and treatment response, eliminating gaps between scheduled evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a home-based assessment system that replicates the clinical evaluation process outside the office setting. Sensors capture movement data during natural activities, and algorithms process this data to generate scores equivalent to clinic-based UPDRS assessments, allowing frequent monitoring without requiring patient travel to the clinic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If detailed decimal fraction scores are assigned beyond the standard 0-4 UPDRS scale, then more granular symptom severity information is captured, but diagnosis is complicated by assigning score values for which there is no universally agreed-upon significance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescore resolutionVSAvoiddiagnostic interpretation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter scale from the traditional discrete 0-4 integer UPDRS scale to a continuous decimal scale with higher resolution. This allows the system to capture subtle variations in symptom severity that integer scoring would miss, while the algorithm maps these continuous values back to clinically meaningful categories for interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback at multiple levels: detailed continuous scores for research and monitoring purposes, and mapped discrete scores for clinical decision-making. This dual-feedback approach allows clinicians to access both granular data and simplified interpretation, maintaining ease of use while capturing precise measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12502121B1Artificial intelligence systems for quantifying movement disorder symptoms and adjusting treatment based on symptom quantification
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 GREAT LAKES NEUROTECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12502121B1 patent drawing
  • US12502121B1 patent drawing
  • US12502121B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for scoring movement disorder symptoms comprises a movement measurement data acquisition system and processing comprising an algorithm trained on standardized scores. The movement measuring apparatus may comprise sensors such as accelerometers or gyroscopes or may utilize motion capture and/or machine vision technology or various other methods to measure tremor, bradykinesia, gait and balance disturbances, dyskinesia, or other movement disorders in a subject afflicted with Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or the like. The system outputs a score having an inclusive 0-4 scale that correlates to the UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS, or to a particular component of the movement disorder such as speed, amplitude or rhythm, but has greater resolution and lower variability. In some embodiments, the system is used to provide recommendations for treatment and/or to provide treatment in the form of pharmaceutical drugs and/or electric stimulus as part of a closed-loop system.