AI Multi-Modal Route Generation with Safety and Cost Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for generating transportation routes are inefficient and ineffective, particularly in urban environments, as they do not seamlessly integrate multiple transportation types, require manual planning and payment, and lack real-time adjustments based on user preferences and safety analysis.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system using AI to generate efficient transportation routes by analyzing historical trip data, user preferences, and real-time contextual data, which automatically selects and purchases transportation services, and provides safety scores, while also collecting telematics data for model retraining and cost determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional route planning techniques are used, then users can obtain basic transportation directions, but the system cannot seamlessly integrate multiple transportation types or provide real-time optimizations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration of multiple transportation typesVSAvoidroute planning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple transportation types (public transit, rideshare, bike-share, walking) into a single unified route planning platform. The AI model evaluates and combines different transportation modes to generate optimized multi-modal routes, allowing users to access diverse transportation options through one interface rather than separate applications for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects real-time data from mobile devices including location, travel behavior, and user preferences. This feedback is processed by the AI model to dynamically optimize routes during transit and update future route recommendations, enabling real-time adaptations based on actual travel conditions and user responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual route planning and payment processes are used, then users can control their travel choices, but the process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute planning convenienceVSAvoidtime for manual planning and payment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores optimized routes using AI models trained on historical trip data before users need them. When a user requests a route, the system quickly retrieves and presents pre-processed route options with associated costs and times, eliminating the need for users to manually plan each aspect of their journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically handles payment processing for multiple transportation types through integrated payment methods. Users select their preferred payment option once, and the system autonomously manages transactions across different service providers including public transit, rideshare companies, and bike-share programs without requiring manual intervention for each payment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If basic route information is provided, then users receive simple directions, but safety analysis and real-time adjustments are not available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assessmentVSAvoidsystem functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the route into discrete segments, each associated with a specific transportation type and safety profile. The AI model evaluates safety factors for each segment independently (such as crime rates, traffic conditions, and well-lit areas) and provides detailed safety information for each portion of the journey, allowing users to make informed decisions about each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides dynamic safety monitoring and real-time route adjustments based on changing conditions. The AI model continuously updates safety assessments during transit using real-time data from mobile devices and external sources, automatically suggesting alternative routes if safety conditions deteriorate, and providing push notifications about safety concerns along the current route.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If historical trip data is collected, then the AI model can be trained for better route generation, but data privacy and security concerns arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute optimization accuracyVSAvoiddata privacy risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements differential privacy and data anonymization techniques that preserve the utility of historical trip data for AI training while protecting individual user identities. Sensitive personal information is obscured or aggregated in ways that maintain route optimization accuracy without exposing specific users' travel patterns to unauthorized parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240377211A1Automated route generation and frictionless engagement systems and methods
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US20240377211A1 patent drawing
  • US20240377211A1 patent drawing
  • US20240377211A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system may be provided. The computer system may include at least one processor. The at least one processor may be programmed to: (i) receive, from a user device, a trip request including a destination location for a trip; (ii) generate, based upon the trip request using an AI model, a route including a plurality of route segments, each of the plurality of route segments associated with a respective type of transportation, wherein the AI model is trained using historical trip records including historical trip data associated with historical trips; (iii) generate a user interface, the user interface including instructions associated with the generated route, the instructions indicating the respective type of transportation to be used for each route segment; and/or (iv) cause the user device to display the generated user interface.