AI Negotiation Platform for Unbiased Dispute Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional dispute resolution methods, particularly in the legal system, are often costly, complex, and inaccessible to the average citizen, leading to unresolved conflicts and public dissatisfaction.

Innovation Solution

The e.Resolv/e.DNA system utilizes a technologically enhanced, AI and EQ-driven platform for electronic negotiation, which simplifies the dispute resolution process by neutralizing emotional aspects and providing a fair, unbiased negotiation environment without the need for human representatives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional legal system methods are used for dispute resolution, then formal and authoritative resolution is achieved, but cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformal resolution authorityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical legal system (courts, lawyers, formal procedures) with an electronic negotiation platform that uses software algorithms, AI assistants, and automated processes to facilitate dispute resolution. This substitution maintains the authority and reliability of formal resolution while dramatically reducing system complexity and accessibility barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electronic negotiation platform as an intermediary between disputing parties, which includes AI assistants and automated facilitation tools. This intermediary guides parties through structured negotiation processes, providing formal resolution capabilities without requiring direct access to the complex traditional legal system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional legal system methods are used for dispute resolution, then formal and authoritative resolution is achieved, but accessibility to average citizens deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformal resolution authorityVSAvoidcitizen accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical legal system (courts, lawyers, formal procedures) with an electronic negotiation platform that uses software algorithms, AI assistants, and automated processes to facilitate dispute resolution. This substitution maintains the authority and reliability of formal resolution while dramatically reducing system complexity and accessibility barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables parties to resolve their own disputes through the electronic negotiation platform without requiring attorneys or formal legal representation. The system provides self-service capabilities including automated negotiation facilitation, AI assistance, and structured communication tools that empower citizens to access formal resolution authority independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If human representatives are involved in negotiation, then emotional aspects and bias are introduced, but human judgment and flexibility are maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman judgment flexibilityVSAvoidemotional bias
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the emotional and biased human elements from the negotiation process by using an electronic platform with AI assistants to facilitate discussions. The system removes harmful emotional factors while maintaining necessary human judgment through selective human intervention options and AI-driven analysis of negotiation dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electronic negotiation platform as an intermediary between disputing parties, which includes AI assistants and automated facilitation tools. This intermediary guides parties through structured negotiation processes, providing formal resolution capabilities without requiring direct access to the complex traditional legal system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If electronic negotiation platform is implemented, then accessibility and cost-effectiveness improve, but automation extent increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem accessibilityVSAvoidhuman intervention level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic negotiation platform that adapts the level of automation based on negotiation needs and party preferences. The system can operate with high automation for routine matters while allowing human intervention when complex judgment or emotional sensitivity is required, optimizing both accessibility and appropriate human involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250086740A1e.Resolv/e.DNA - Resultative Electronic Negotiation
Publication Date: 2025.03.13 PUCKETT DAVID
  • US20250086740A1 patent drawing
  • US20250086740A1 patent drawing
  • US20250086740A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Our invention will take this proven negotiation process used world-wide and translate it into an entirely electronic process that is augmented and complimented by leveraging our proprietary algorithms, which leverage both Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Emotional Intelligence (EQ), to remove all human advantages to the process of resolving all types of human conflicts and disputes by allowing the process methodology and technology to negotiate for the parties, without humans, and thus to biases, and individual advantages to the process of using negotiation to resolve disputes and without the need for any human representatives such as professional negotiators or attorneys. See attached process and architecture documentation and the primary algorithm for explanation. This invention includes the option to involve other Human Elements if the “human-less” process hits an impasse and the parties desire advisory services to conclude the negotiation process.