AI Network Architecture Configuration for Real-Time Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional network configuration systems face challenges in efficiently determining optimal network layouts, resource allocation, and real-time adjustments, leading to resource overconsumption, downtime, and increased costs due to manual input and inaccurate configurations.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing generative AI to determine network configurations based on service requests, monitor network health, and adjust node layouts in real-time, incorporating quantum simulations for probabilistic distribution and secure zone creation to mitigate anomalies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual configuration methods are used for network nodes, then configuration flexibility is maintained, but configuration accuracy and efficiency deteriorate due to human error and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-configuration of network nodes through AI models that autonomously determine optimal configurations, allocate resources, and adjust parameters without manual intervention, thereby eliminating human error and reducing configuration time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual configuration processes are replaced with automated computational systems including AI models, machine learning algorithms, and quantum simulations that calculate and implement network configurations programmatically, substituting human operators with intelligent software agents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If traditional network configuration systems are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates due to inability to perform real-time optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network configuration system transitions from static pre-defined configurations to dynamic real-time optimization, where AI models continuously monitor network conditions and automatically adjust node configurations, resource allocation, and topology to optimize performance metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Quantum simulations and AI models perform predictive analysis and pre-calculate optimal network configurations before actual deployment, allowing the system to proactively prepare and implement optimized configurations in advance of actual network demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated configuration systems are implemented, then configuration speed is improved, but system complexity increases due to integration of AI models and quantum simulations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex automated configuration system is divided into modular functional components including service request handlers, AI model engines, quantum simulation modules, and configuration deployment systems, allowing independent development, testing, and maintenance of each subsystem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

APIs, message queues, and standardized communication protocols serve as intermediaries between different system components (AI models, quantum simulations, network nodes), enabling loose coupling and simplified integration while maintaining high automation capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If real-time monitoring and adjustment are implemented, then network adaptability is improved, but computing resource consumption increases due to continuous analysis and optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork adaptabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring and optimization cycles rather than continuous real-time processing, where AI models analyze network parameters at optimized intervals and make adjustments only when significant changes are detected, reducing unnecessary computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts monitoring frequency and optimization intensity based on network conditions, scaling resource consumption up or down by changing operational parameters such as sampling rates, analysis depth, and adjustment aggressiveness to match actual network needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250260626A1Systems and methods for configuring network architecture using advanced computational models for data analysis and automated processing
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20250260626A1 patent drawing
  • US20250260626A1 patent drawing
  • US20250260626A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, computer program products, and methods are described herein for configuring network architecture using advanced computational models for data analysis and automated processing. The present disclosure is configured to receive a service request, wherein the service request comprises configuring a node to complete the service request; determine a protocol based on the service request, wherein the protocol comprises evaluating the service request using application servers; determine the node to be used in a network configuration, wherein the node is determined in response to decision compute requirements; arrange, using an artificial intelligence (AI) model, the node into the network configuration, wherein the AI model optimizes the network configuration based on the decision compute requirements and one or more network parameters; and monitor the network configuration using a configuration monitor, wherein the configuration monitor analyzes the one or more network parameters.