AI Network Security Nodes for Detection Accuracy and Response Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security mechanisms for computing environments suffer from inaccuracy in detection, inappropriate recovery plans, and bureaucratic limitations, leading to inefficiencies in managing network security effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) nodes to manage physical and digital assets within a computing environment, including AI detection nodes to identify non-desired events and AI response nodes to analyze these events using machine learning techniques to determine customized recovery plans and tailored protection protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional network security mechanisms are used, then basic security functions are provided, but detection accuracy is low and error rates are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional rule-based and signature-based security detection mechanisms with machine learning-based AI detection nodes. These AI nodes use supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms to analyze network traffic patterns, user behavior, and system events, enabling more accurate detection of cyber-attacks and anomalies while reducing false positives and detection errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters and thresholds based on learned patterns from training data and real-time analysis. The AI models adapt their sensitivity and decision boundaries by changing internal parameters through continuous learning, allowing optimization of detection accuracy while minimizing error rates across different attack scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If centralized security management is implemented, then coordination is improved, but bureaucratic limitations reduce responsiveness and efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse efficiencyVSAvoidsystem bureaucracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the security management system into distributed AI nodes (detection nodes, response nodes, and management nodes) that operate semi-independently across the network. Each node performs specific functions locally while communicating with others, eliminating centralized bureaucratic bottlenecks and enabling parallel processing of security events, which significantly improves response efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The AI-driven security system enables automated self-service capabilities where AI detection nodes automatically identify threats, AI response nodes autonomously execute countermeasures, and the system self-adjusts its detection parameters through continuous learning. This automation eliminates manual intervention requirements and bureaucratic approval processes, dramatically improving productivity and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If generic security protocols are applied, then implementation is simplified, but recovery plans are inappropriate for specific threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements AI response nodes that generate customized recovery plans and protection protocols tailored to each specific detected threat and organizational context. The system analyzes the nature, severity, and characteristics of each cyber-attack to produce localized, context-specific responses rather than applying uniform generic protocols, thereby achieving high adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of time

If manual security management is used, then control is precise, but workload is excessive and timeliness is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidmanual workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The AI-driven security system performs automated threat detection, analysis, and response execution without requiring manual human intervention for routine operations. The AI models continuously monitor network traffic, automatically identify anomalies, and trigger appropriate countermeasures in real-time, dramatically reducing both response time and manual workload while maintaining high levels of security management effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12301601B2System and method to manage a network security of a computing environment (CE)
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 DSOUZA RICHARD
  • US12301601B2 patent drawing
  • US12301601B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to management of network security of a computing environment. The method may include; utilizing an Artificial intelligence (AI) node to enable management of one or more physical assets and one or more digital assets of the CE, wherein the management comprises automatic control of at least one task related to access of data and communications thereof, wherein the at least one task is selected from: locking, unlocking, encryption, decryption, activation, and deactivation; detecting a non-desired event, which occurred at one or more physical assets and one or more digital assets; analysing the detected non-desired event through a machine learning technique to determine a customized recovery plan and a tailored protection protocol against the detected non-desired event.